It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNPSCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPSCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GGB (@Steel) experienced а +9.68% price change this week, while NPSCY (@Steel) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.45%.
GGB is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
NPSCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
GGB | NPSCY | GGB / NPSCY | |
Capitalization | 6.94B | 20.9B | 33% |
EBITDA | 9.8B | 1.16T | 1% |
Gain YTD | -13.713 | -9.730 | 141% |
P/E Ratio | 8.55 | 6.52 | 131% |
Revenue | 64.6B | 8.87T | 1% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
GGB | NPSCY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGB's Valuation (4) in the Steel industry is in the same range as NPSCY (9) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to NPSCY’s over the last 12 months.
NPSCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GGB (40) in the Steel industry. This means that NPSCY’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.
NPSCY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GGB (70) in the Steel industry. This means that NPSCY’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.
GGB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Steel industry is in the same range as NPSCY (73) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to NPSCY’s over the last 12 months.
GGB's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPSCY (61) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPSCY’s over the last 12 months.
GGB | NPSCY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago76% | 9 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NPSCY and USNZY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPSCY and USNZY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPSCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPSCY | 100% | -1.66% | ||
USNZY - NPSCY | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
SID - NPSCY | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
RS - NPSCY | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
GGB - NPSCY | 17% Poorly correlated | -3.68% | ||
NISTF - NPSCY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |