Graco Inc. (GGG) and Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) represent two established players in the industrials space, offering investors a lens into equipment and tools markets. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance trends, and positioning to assist traders and portfolio managers assessing relative value within the sector. The analysis draws on observable market data and company fundamentals to highlight contrasts that may inform allocation decisions for those focused on industrial exposure.
Graco Inc. (GGG) designs, manufactures, and markets systems for managing fluids and coatings across industrial, contractor, and process applications. Its operations span three segments: Contractor, Industrial, and Expansion Markets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range influenced by first-quarter 2026 results that missed analyst expectations on both revenue and EPS. Year-to-date returns have lagged the broader market, reflecting tempered sentiment following the earnings shortfall and ongoing macroeconomic considerations in industrial demand. Upcoming second-quarter results, scheduled for release in late July, represent a key near-term catalyst that could shape investor perception of organic growth trends.
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) manufactures and markets high-end tools, equipment, diagnostics, and repair solutions primarily for professional users in automotive, industrial, and related fields. The company operates through segments including Commercial & Industrial, Snap-on Tools, Repair Systems & Information, and Financial Services. Recent market activity has shown the stock maintaining upward momentum, with year-to-date gains outpacing the S&P 500 benchmark. Strong performance has been supported by consistent demand in its core markets and favorable positioning ahead of its own second-quarter earnings release. Broader sentiment appears constructive, aided by the stock’s proximity to recent highs and resilient fundamentals in professional tool demand.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across various styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the strongest and most suitable bots earn placement in this trending section, where users can review available statistics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns that typically range across diverse parameters depending on the bot’s design. These bots differ widely in their approaches and ticker coverage, providing traders with flexible options. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed insights.
Graco Inc. (GGG) and Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) both serve industrial end-markets yet diverge in their core offerings: GGG specializes in fluid management and dispensing systems, while SNA focuses on hand tools, diagnostics, and repair equipment. Growth drivers for GGG center on industrial and construction activity, whereas SNA benefits from recurring demand in vehicle repair and professional services. Recent momentum favors SNA, with superior year-to-date performance relative to GGG’s more muted results following its earnings miss. Risk factors include cyclical exposure for both, though GGG may face greater sensitivity to capital spending cycles and SNA to automotive repair volumes. Sector sentiment remains mixed amid economic uncertainty, with SNA exhibiting greater price stability in recent periods. Investors weighing these names must balance GGG’s established niche in fluid technologies against SNA’s broader tool ecosystem and stronger recent relative returns.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative returns, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Snap-on Incorporated (SNA). The stock’s stronger year-to-date trajectory and resilience near recent highs provide a more constructive backdrop compared with Graco Inc. (GGG)’s post-earnings pressure. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data rather than forward guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GGG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GGG (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.31% price change this week, while SNA (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -4.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.
GGG is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
SNA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-3.65% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| GGG | SNA | GGG / SNA | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 20.8B | 59% |
| EBITDA | 744M | 1.49B | 50% |
| Gain YTD | -9.210 | 17.940 | -51% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.16 | 20.71 | 117% |
| Revenue | 2.25B | 5.22B | 43% |
| Total Cash | 712M | 1.75B | 41% |
| Total Debt | 52.9M | 1.27B | 4% |
GGG | SNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGG's Valuation (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNA (71) in the Tools And Hardware industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNA’s over the last 12 months.
SNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Tools And Hardware industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGG (85) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SNA’s stock grew significantly faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
GGG's SMR Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as SNA (49) in the Tools And Hardware industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to SNA’s over the last 12 months.
SNA's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Tools And Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (62) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
SNA's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Tools And Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (74) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that SNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
| GGG | SNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 38% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 47% | 8 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGG has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGG jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGG | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| LECO - GGG | 74% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| ITW - GGG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| AOS - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| NDSN - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| ROP - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNA has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNA jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNA | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| GGG - SNA | 66% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| DOV - SNA | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| DCI - SNA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FELE - SNA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| NDSN - SNA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
More | ||||