GHC
Price
$1138.57
Change
+$1.77 (+0.16%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.82B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LGPS
Price
$0.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
19.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHC vs LGPS

GHC vs LGPS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. LGPS commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a StrongBuy and LGPS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($4.82B) has a higher market cap than LGPS($19.6M). GHC has higher P/E ratio than LGPS: GHC (9.20) vs LGPS (3.96). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 4.146 vs. LGPS (-10.407). LGPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. GHC (932M). LGPS has higher revenues than GHC: LGPS (22.2B) vs GHC (5.07B).
GHCLGPSGHC / LGPS
Capitalization4.82B19.6M24,602%
EBITDA932M1.65B56%
Gain YTD4.146-10.407-40%
P/E Ratio9.203.96232%
Revenue5.07B22.2B23%
Total Cash1.25BN/A-
Total Debt1.34BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCLGPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (GHC: $1138.57 vs. LGPS: $0.83)
Brand notoriety: GHC and LGPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 87% vs. LGPS: 3%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $4.82B vs. LGPS: $19.6M
GHC [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $4.82B. LGPS’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $19.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $124.33K to $139.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while LGPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LGPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than LGPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGPS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LGPS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than LGPS.

Price Growth

GHC (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while LGPS (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -11.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.79% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

View a ticker or compare two or three
GHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LGPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSOL9.940.23
+2.40%
21shares Solana Staking ETF
RSPN59.900.58
+0.98%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Indls ETF
IQLT50.480.29
+0.58%
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
OPP7.360.02
+0.27%
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund
TLDR25.020.01
+0.04%
The Laddered T-Bill ETF

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+0.16%
MSA - GHC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CASS - GHC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
AZZ - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
BRC - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
EXPO - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More

LGPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGPS and GHC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGPS and GHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGPS
1D Price
Change %
LGPS100%
+0.01%
GHC - LGPS
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
MMM - LGPS
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
NNBR - LGPS
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
MAMK - LGPS
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBYD - LGPS
-0%
Poorly correlated
-6.78%
More