| GK | IWF | GK / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 12.393 | 3.139 | 395% |
| Net Assets | 31M | 126B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.18 | 428% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 13.00 | 485% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.33 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| GK | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GK and PGNY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GK and PGNY's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
More | ||||