GLAPF vs GLUC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAPF is a Hold and GLUC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLAPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLUC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GLAPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
GLAPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -10.93% price change this week, while GLUC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -9.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLUC is expected to report earnings on Jan 09, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| GLAPF | GLUC | GLAPF / GLUC | |
| Capitalization | 4.15B | 648K | 639,815% |
| EBITDA | 387M | -32.45K | -1,192,641% |
| Gain YTD | -9.576 | -35.179 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.98 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.64B | 88.1K | 6,404,086% |
| Total Cash | 439M | 29.3K | 1,498,294% |
| Total Debt | 1.01B | 431K | 235,035% |
GLAPF | GLUC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLAPF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (57). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.
GLAPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (98). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.
GLAPF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (100). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.
GLUC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (83). This means that GLUC’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.
GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLAPF (75). This means that GLUC’s stock grew significantly faster than GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LOGOX | 37.69 | -0.12 | -0.32% |
| Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Instl | |||
| IJEAX | 11.48 | -0.08 | -0.69% |
| VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity A | |||
| MIEYX | 18.45 | -0.25 | -1.34% |
| MM S&P 500® Index Adm | |||
| SFMIX | 39.97 | -0.60 | -1.48% |
| American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5 | |||
| LCCAX | 37.96 | -0.58 | -1.50% |
| Columbia Contrarian Core A | |||
GLAPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAPF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLAPF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLAPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAPF | 100% | -10.93% | ||
| HNFSA - GLAPF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UVRBF - GLAPF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRPT - GLAPF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| GRBMF - GLAPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLUC - GLAPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GLUC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and ZHYBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and ZHYBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLUC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLUC | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZHYBF - GLUC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GUZOF - GLUC | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLAPY - GLUC | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GPDNF - GLUC | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
| GRBMF - GLUC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||