Advertisement
GMED vs TMCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMED is a Hold and TMCI is a Hold.
| GMED | TMCI | GMED / TMCI | |
| Capitalization | 9.96B | 295M | 3,377% |
| EBITDA | 954M | -45.32M | -2,105% |
| Gain YTD | -15.027 | 84.082 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.97 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.15B | 205M | 1,534% |
| Total Cash | 595M | 45.6M | 1,305% |
| Total Debt | 111M | 72.7M | 153% |
GMED | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GMED | TMCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TMCI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GMED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TMCI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMCI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TMCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GMED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.24% price change this week, while TMCI (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -6.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
TMCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
GMED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMED has been loosely correlated with TMCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMED jumps, then TMCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMED | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| TMCI - GMED | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.68% | ||
| TNDM - GMED | 46% Loosely correlated | -6.55% | ||
| MDT - GMED | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| SYK - GMED | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| ILMN - GMED | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
More | ||||
TMCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMCI has been loosely correlated with UTMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMCI jumps, then UTMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMCI | 100% | +3.68% | ||
| UTMD - TMCI | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| GMED - TMCI | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| CRL - TMCI | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| AZTA - TMCI | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| MTD - TMCI | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||