Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GNR vs HAP
GNR vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs HAP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.26
Change+$0.19 (+0.36%)
Volume$105.52K
Net Assets2.75B
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$51.05
Change+$0.20 (+0.39%)
Volume$5.09K
Net Assets154.99M
GNR vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. HAP commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Buy and HAP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.75B vs. HAP (155M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: HAP (11.946) vs GNR (8.579). GNR was incepted earlier than HAP: GNR (15 years) vs HAP (17 years). GNR (0.40) and HAP (0.42) have comparable expense ratios . HAP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | HAP | GNR / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | 8.579 | 11.946 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 155M | 1,774% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.42 | 95% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 54.00 | 28% |
| Yield | 4.44 | 2.41 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| TECK - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| E - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||