Ad is loading...
GNR vs HAP
GNR vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs HAP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$51.79
Change-$0.15 (-0.29%)
Volume$55.33K
Net Assets2.72B
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$48.51
Change-$0.21 (-0.43%)
Volume$8.9K
Net Assets147.92M
GNR vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. HAP commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a StrongBuy and HAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.72B vs. HAP (148M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: HAP (6.382) vs GNR (4.080). GNR was incepted earlier than HAP: GNR (15 years) vs HAP (17 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than HAP (0.43). HAP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | HAP | GNR / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | 4.080 | 6.382 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 148M | 1,836% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.43 | 93% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 26.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 4.43 | 2.43 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 83% | 21 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 78% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| TECK - HAP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| E - HAP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||