GNR
Price
$77.63
Change
-$0.96 (-1.22%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.31B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REMX
Price
$68.91
Change
-$1.65 (-2.34%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNR vs REMX

GNR vs REMX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) vs. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)

Key Takeaways

  • SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) provides diversified exposure across agriculture, energy, and metals & mining through a broad global index, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) offers concentrated thematic exposure to rare earth and strategic metals producers.
  • GNR maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.40% compared to REMX’s 0.53%, supporting cost efficiency for longer-term holdings in natural resources.
  • GNR holds approximately 90-110 securities with top positions capped, emphasizing large-cap global leaders, whereas REMX concentrates in roughly 35 holdings focused on rare earth and strategic metals companies.
  • Sector allocation in GNR spans materials, energy, and consumer staples, while REMX is nearly 100% allocated to the materials sector with heavy emphasis on rare earth and strategic metals.
  • Both ETFs track passive indices with annual or quarterly rebalancing, but GNR’s equal-weighted sub-index structure provides broader commodity producer balance than REMX’s market-cap-weighted rare earth focus.
  • REMX exhibits higher volatility due to its narrow thematic mandate and emerging-market concentration, while GNR offers relatively more stable positioning across multiple natural resource sub-sectors.

Introduction

Investors seeking commodity-related equity exposure often evaluate SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) as complementary yet distinct options within the natural resources space. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative strategies targeting similar investor goals of inflation hedging and resource sector participation. GNR delivers broad-based exposure to global natural resources companies, while REMX narrows focus to the specialized rare earth and strategic metals segment critical for technology and defense supply chains. The comparison highlights structural differences in diversification, cost, and thematic intensity amid ongoing commodity cycles and geopolitical supply considerations.

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) Overview

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. The index equally weights three sub-indices covering agriculture, energy, and metals & mining, with each sub-index capped at one-third of total weight. The fund holds approximately 90-110 securities and features a net expense ratio of 0.40%. Top holdings typically include BHP Group Ltd, Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), Nutrien Ltd. (NTR), Shell plc (SHEL), and Corteva Inc. (CTVA). Sector allocations emphasize materials (around 60%) and energy (around 30%), with the balance in consumer staples. The strategy employs physical replication and annual rebalancing, providing diversified exposure to large-cap global commodity producers without leverage or active management.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) Overview

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is a passive thematic ETF designed to replicate the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. The fund invests at least 80% of assets in companies engaged in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals. It holds approximately 33-37 securities with a net expense ratio of 0.53%. Top holdings commonly feature Albemarle Corp. (ALB), China Northern Rare Earth Group, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd., Pilbara Minerals Ltd., and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The portfolio is 100% allocated to the materials sector, with significant exposure to emerging markets including China and Australia. The index uses modified market-capitalization weighting and rebalances quarterly, resulting in a concentrated, non-diversified structure focused solely on this specialized metals niche.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The natural resources sector encompasses global demand for commodities essential to energy transition, agriculture, and advanced manufacturing. Rare earth and strategic metals within this space face heightened attention due to their role in electric vehicles, wind turbines, semiconductors, and defense technologies. Geopolitical tensions and supply-chain diversification efforts have increased focus on non-Chinese production capacity. Macro drivers include interest rate expectations affecting mining project financing, commodity price cycles, and regulatory developments around critical minerals. Sector risks involve price volatility in underlying commodities, environmental regulations, and concentration of processing capacity in specific regions. Capital flows into thematic materials strategies have accelerated in recent market cycles as investors seek exposure to supply-chain resilience themes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has delivered exposure aligned with broad commodity producer performance, benefiting from energy and metals price movements while maintaining balance across sub-sectors. VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has shown more pronounced swings tied to rare earth price dynamics, lithium-related holdings, and shifts in technology demand. GNR’s diversified structure tends to moderate volatility relative to REMX’s concentrated thematic mandate during periods of sector rotation or commodity-specific corrections. Both ETFs respond to macroeconomic shifts such as industrial production trends and geopolitical developments affecting supply, yet GNR’s broader holdings provide relatively steadier positioning across energy and agricultural cycles compared with REMX’s sensitivity to rare earth market sentiment.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors evaluating natural resources exposure may find the tool useful for refining ETF comparisons and uncovering related opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural diversification, lower expense ratio, and broader sector coverage, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) for investors seeking natural resources exposure. Its balanced sub-index approach and cost efficiency provide a more resilient profile across commodity cycles compared with the higher-concentration and higher-cost structure of VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of diversification benefits and expense considerations rather than a guarantee of future results.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GNR vs. REMX commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Hold and REMX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 5.32B vs. REMX (2.07B). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than REMX: GNR (27.971) vs REMX (-4.545). GNR was incepted earlier than REMX: GNR (16 years) vs REMX (16 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than REMX (0.53). REMX has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
GNRREMXGNR / REMX
Gain YTD27.971-4.545-615%
Net Assets5.32B2.07B256%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.5375%
Turnover15.0074.0020%
Yield2.341.67140%
Fund Existence16 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNRREMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSTR22.560.29
+1.30%
KraneShares CHN Tech & Semicon STAR50ETF
GRNI21.040.21
+0.99%
Fundstrat Granny Shots Us Large Cap & Income ETF
GIAX15.920.09
+0.60%
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
TIPX18.42-0.09
-0.49%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg 1-10 YrTIPSETF
UCIB38.20-0.97
-2.46%
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB

REMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REMX has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REMX jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REMX
1D Price
Change %
REMX100%
-2.57%
LAR - REMX
76%
Closely correlated
-8.74%
ALB - REMX
70%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
SQM - REMX
68%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
MP - REMX
66%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SLI - REMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More