GOOX
Price
$76.75
Change
-$0.48 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
55.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$90.37
Change
-$0.85 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
13.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOOX vs QLD

GOOX vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? T-REX 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • GOOX offers concentrated 2x daily leveraged exposure to Alphabet Inc. (GOOG), a single communication services giant, while QLD provides diversified 2x daily leverage to the Nasdaq-100 Index across technology and growth sectors.
  • GOOX has a higher expense ratio of 1.05% compared to QLD's net 0.95%, reflecting its single-stock focus and active derivative usage.
  • Both ETFs employ daily rebalancing via swaps and derivatives, amplifying volatility and introducing compounding risks unsuitable for long-term holding.
  • GOOX exhibits lower liquidity with smaller AUM (~$55 million) and wider bid-ask spreads versus QLD's massive scale ($13+ billion AUM) and tight spreads.
  • GOOX carries extreme concentration risk tied to one stock's performance, whereas QLD benefits from broader Nasdaq-100 diversification including top holdings like NVDA and AAPL.
  • In AI-driven markets, QLD's multi-company exposure may offer more resilient positioning amid sector rotation.

Introduction

GOOX and QLD represent high-octane leveraged strategies appealing to tactical traders amid the ongoing AI and technology boom. GOOX targets amplified exposure to Alphabet Inc., a key player in search, cloud, and AI, while QLD doubles down on the Nasdaq-100 Index, home to leading innovators in semiconductors, software, and consumer tech. Though both deliver 2x daily leverage, they diverge sharply: GOOX as a single-stock bet versus QLD's diversified index play. This comparison is timely as investors navigate sector momentum, interest rate shifts, and AI adoption cycles, weighing concentrated conviction against broader growth exposure in a volatile market environment.

T-REX 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) Overview

The T-REX 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX), launched January 11, 2024 by REX Shares and Tuttle Capital Management, seeks daily investment results of 200% the performance of Alphabet Inc. Class C shares (GOOG), before fees. This single-stock leveraged ETF uses derivatives like total return swaps to achieve its target, holding approximately 5 positions including swap receivables on GOOG (over 100% combined weighting), cash equivalents, and payables.

Top holdings feature GOOG exposure at ~82-87%, with collateral like pledged securities from Cantor and Clear Street. Sector allocation is 100% communication services, concentrated in interactive media and services. The expense ratio stands at 1.05%, with AUM around $55 million. Daily rebalancing ensures leverage reset but heightens volatility decay and counterparty risks. As a non-diversified fund, GOOX suits short-term traders bullish on Alphabet's AI advancements, though its narrow focus amplifies company-specific risks like regulatory scrutiny on advertising and cloud competition.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), issued by ProShares since June 19, 2006, aims for daily investment results corresponding to 2x the Nasdaq-100 Index performance, before fees. This passive leveraged ETF tracks the modified market-cap-weighted index of 100 large non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies via swaps, futures, and direct holdings.

With over 100 holdings, top exposures include derivatives on the index and equities like NVDA (~6%), AAPL (~5%), MSFT (~4%), AMZN (~3.5%), and Alphabet shares (~5% combined). Sector breakdown emphasizes technology (54%), communication services (16%), and consumer cyclical (13%). Net expense ratio is 0.95% (gross 0.98%), AUM exceeds $13 billion. Daily rebalancing maintains leverage, supporting high liquidity with tight 0.01% median bid-ask spreads. QLD offers scalable access to tech growth leaders, balancing mega-cap stability with leveraged upside.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology and communication services sectors underpinning GOOX and QLD thrive amid AI proliferation, cloud expansion, and digital transformation. Catalysts include surging demand for AI chips and models, with Big Tech capex projected to rise into 2026, fueling Nasdaq-100 constituents. Alphabet benefits from Gemini AI monetization, custom TPUs challenging NVDA, and a $155 billion cloud backlog, alongside search dominance.

Macro drivers like moderating interest rates support growth stocks, while capital flows favor AI themes. Regulatory risks loom, including antitrust probes into ad tech and data privacy for Alphabet, plus broader U.S.-China tensions impacting semis. Sector rotation away from mega-caps or economic slowdowns pose threats, yet innovation cycles and enterprise AI adoption sustain momentum for these ETFs' exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Both ETFs exhibit amplified volatility tied to their benchmarks over recent market cycles. GOOX, since inception, has mirrored 2x Alphabet's daily moves, benefiting from the stock's AI-fueled rallies but suffering outsized drawdowns during pullbacks. QLD has captured twice the Nasdaq-100's upside in bull phases, driven by NVDA and cloud leaders, though leverage erodes returns in sideways or choppy conditions.

Relative to each other, QLD's diversification tempers single-name risks evident in GOOX, showing smoother paths through earnings volatility and sector shifts. In recent weeks, tech momentum has favored QLD amid broader index gains, while GOOX tracks Alphabet's cloud and AI catalysts more closely. Volatility profiles align at ~2x their underlyings, but GOOX's concentration heightens beta to tech sub-themes like search disruption.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic environments like leveraged ETF trading.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors QLD over GOOX in the current environment. QLD's diversified Nasdaq-100 exposure provides structural resilience across AI leaders, superior liquidity, and cost efficiency relative to GOOX's single-stock concentration. While GOOX offers precise leverage to Alphabet's momentum, its elevated risks and narrower profile yield lower probability of consistent outperformance amid sector breadth and volatility. Probabilistically, QLD aligns better with ongoing tech cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GOOX vs. QLD commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOOX is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.6B vs. GOOX (55.7M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than GOOX: QLD (28.461) vs GOOX (9.989). GOOX was incepted earlier than QLD: GOOX (2 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than GOOX (1.05). QLD has a higher turnover GOOX (0.00) vs GOOX (0.00).
GOOXQLDGOOX / QLD
Gain YTD9.98928.46135%
Net Assets55.7M13.6B0%
Total Expense Ratio1.050.95111%
Turnover0.0016.00-
Yield0.000.12-
Fund Existence2 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOOXQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOOX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTKLX81.43N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp A
FSNIX18.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
FRINX12.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income A
ABCEX12.19N/A
N/A
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset C
MXIVX16.98N/A
N/A
Empower International Value Inv

GOOX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOX has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOX jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOOX
1D Price
Change %
GOOX100%
-0.62%
GOOG - GOOX
99%
Closely correlated
-0.30%

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-0.87%
LRCX - QLD
73%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
NVDA - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
KLAC - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
MU - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
More