Advertisement
GPC vs KAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPC is a Hold and KAR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GPC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KAR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GPC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GPC (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while KAR (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
GPC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
KAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.52% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| GPC | KAR | GPC / KAR | |
| Capitalization | 19.4B | 3.09B | 628% |
| EBITDA | 1.65B | 324M | 508% |
| Gain YTD | 22.345 | 46.522 | 48% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.01 | 39.82 | 60% |
| Revenue | 23.8B | 1.86B | 1,282% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 119M | - |
| Total Debt | 6.42B | 56.8M | 11,306% |
GPC | KAR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPC's Valuation (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAR (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAR’s over the last 12 months.
KAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GPC (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that KAR’s stock grew similarly to GPC’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's SMR Rating (49) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAR (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAR’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as KAR (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew similarly to KAR’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for KAR (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew significantly faster than KAR’s over the last 12 months.
| GPC | KAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 16 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WRND | 34.62 | 0.12 | +0.36% |
| NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| TMFS | 36.04 | 0.09 | +0.24% |
| Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| NDAA | 20.98 | N/A | N/A |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF | |||
| DNOV | 46.11 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
| ETG | 20.78 | -0.13 | -0.62% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund | |||
GPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPC has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPC jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPC | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| CPRT - GPC | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| KAR - GPC | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| LKQ - GPC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| FOXF - GPC | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| LOW - GPC | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||