Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGCX vs SCWFX
GPGCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGCX vs SCWFX
GPGCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGCX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGCX (141M). GPGCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGCX (4.32) vs SCWFX (0.54). GPGCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGCX (7 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GPGCX (1.19) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGCX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGCX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. GPGCX (7.80). GPGCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.20 vs. SCWFX (-7.47).
| GPGCX | SCWFX | GPGCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.511 | 9.953 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 0.54 | 796% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 11.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 26.17 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.20 | -7.47 | -458% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers