Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGCX vs SCWFX
GPGCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGCX vs SCWFX
GPGCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGCX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GPGCX (146M). GPGCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGCX (3.99) vs SCWFX (0.56). GPGCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGCX (7 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GPGCX (1.19) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGCX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGCX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. GPGCX (6.03). GPGCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.87 vs. SCWFX (-9.66).
| GPGCX | SCWFX | GPGCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.715 | 12.243 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 0.56 | 712% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 8.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.72 | 37.17 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.87 | -9.66 | -361% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement