Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGIX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGIX (348M). GPGIX (0.94) and SFCWX (0.92) have matching dividends . GPGIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGIX (15 years) vs SFCWX (10 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGIX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. GPGIX (7.97). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : -5.06 vs. GPGIX (-32.66).
| GPGIX | SFCWX | GPGIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.65 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.795 | 10.588 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 348M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.92 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 13.30 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.64 | 29.10 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.66 | -5.06 | 646% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.46 | N/A | - |