Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGIX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GPGIX (352M). GPGIX (0.93) and SFCWX (0.92) have matching dividends . GPGIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGIX (15 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGIX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.40 vs. GPGIX (11.89). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 0.84 vs. GPGIX (-29.98).
| GPGIX | SFCWX | GPGIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.65 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.364 | 17.042 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 24.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.00 | 44.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.98 | 0.84 | -3,562% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement