Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGIX vs SFCWX
GPGIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGIX is a Hold and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGIX (349M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: GPGIX (0.93) vs SFCWX (0.86). GPGIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGIX (15 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGIX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. GPGIX (6.81). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. GPGIX (-31.23).
| GPGIX | SFCWX | GPGIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.65 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.511 | 12.242 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 349M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.86 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 14.33 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 31.61 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.23 | -2.29 | 1,362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement