GPIQ
Price
$58.01
Change
-$0.33 (-0.57%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
5.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JEPQ
Price
$61.10
Change
-$0.07 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
43.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPIQ vs JEPQ

GPIQ vs JEPQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 05, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) vs. JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both GPIQ and JEPQ employ active covered-call strategies on Nasdaq-100 equities to generate premium income while seeking capital appreciation.
  • GPIQ maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.29% compared with JEPQ at 0.35%, offering a modest cost advantage.
  • Each fund holds approximately 100–110 Nasdaq-100 securities, with technology comprising the dominant sector allocation in both portfolios.
  • Structural differences arise from issuer-specific option overlays and rebalancing approaches, influencing income stability and upside participation.
  • Both ETFs target investors seeking equity exposure with enhanced yield, though they differ in volatility management and distribution consistency.
  • Relative positioning favors lower-cost structures in prolonged low-volatility environments and higher-premium capture during elevated volatility periods.

Introduction

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) represent two prominent actively managed exchange-traded funds that combine Nasdaq-100 equity exposure with covered-call overlays. They compete directly within the derivative-income category, offering similar investor goals of current income and long-term capital growth. The comparison highlights structural variances in cost, option implementation, and portfolio construction that can influence outcomes across different market regimes.

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) Overview

GPIQ seeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of its assets in Nasdaq-100 companies and employing a dynamic covered-call strategy. The fund holds approximately 104 securities, with the top 10 representing roughly 47% of assets. Technology dominates sector allocation at over 50%, followed by consumer discretionary and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.29%. As an actively managed non-diversified fund, it adjusts option coverage based on market conditions to balance income generation and participation in equity upside.

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) Overview

JEPQ pursues current income alongside capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of Nasdaq-100 equities supplemented by equity-linked notes that facilitate call-option sales. It holds about 109 securities, with top holdings concentrated in large technology names. Technology again accounts for the majority of exposure, with similar secondary allocations to consumer and communication sectors. The expense ratio is 0.35%. The fund targets monthly distributions at a relatively stable level and maintains flexibility in option positioning to manage volatility relative to the benchmark.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Nasdaq-100 universe remains centered on technology and growth-oriented companies, benefiting from ongoing innovation in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital services. Capital flows into equity-premium-income strategies have increased as investors seek yield enhancement amid fluctuating interest-rate expectations. Macroeconomic drivers such as corporate earnings growth, regulatory developments in technology, and broader equity-market sentiment influence both funds. Sector risks include valuation compression during risk-off periods and potential reductions in option premiums during sustained low-volatility environments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered income through option premiums while participating in Nasdaq-100 advances to varying degrees. GPIQ’s lower expense ratio may support modestly higher net returns over extended periods. JEPQ has demonstrated consistent monthly distribution patterns. Relative volatility remains lower than the unhedged Nasdaq-100 Index for both, though the degree of upside capture can differ based on call-option coverage levels during earnings seasons and sector rotations. Positioning favors income-focused investors who prioritize stability over full benchmark participation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine ETF comparisons and uncover additional opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural cost efficiency, diversification profile, and consistent premium-income generation within the Nasdaq-100 ecosystem, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to GPIQ. The lower expense ratio and comparable holdings concentration support this edge in most market environments, though outcomes remain sensitive to volatility regimes and option-premium dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GPIQ vs. JEPQ commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPIQ is a Hold and JEPQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPIQJEPQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GPIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JEPQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSLV26.620.47
+1.80%
Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV)
GDEC40.930.04
+0.10%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC)
MYHA24.850.01
+0.04%
State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHA)
NOVZ48.150.01
+0.02%
TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ)
SQQQ33.77-0.83
-2.40%
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ)

GPIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPIQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPIQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPIQ
1D Price
Change %
GPIQ100%
+0.53%
LRCX - GPIQ
76%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
KLAC - GPIQ
72%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
AMAT - GPIQ
72%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
ASML - GPIQ
69%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
AMD - GPIQ
69%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More

JEPQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JEPQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JEPQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JEPQ
1D Price
Change %
JEPQ100%
+0.26%
LRCX - JEPQ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
AMAT - JEPQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
KLAC - JEPQ
70%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
ASML - JEPQ
69%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
ADI - JEPQ
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
More