GPIQ
Price
$58.01
Change
-$0.33 (-0.57%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
5.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QQQI
Price
$55.55
Change
-$0.28 (-0.50%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
15.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPIQ vs QQQI

GPIQ vs QQQI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 20, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) vs. NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI)

Key Takeaways

  • Both GPIQ and QQQI are actively managed covered-call exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that provide exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index while generating income through options premiums.
  • GPIQ offers a lower expense ratio of 0.29 percent compared with 0.68 percent for QQQI, potentially improving net returns for cost-conscious investors.
  • Each fund holds approximately 100 to 106 Nasdaq-100 constituents, with top holdings concentrated in large technology names such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation.
  • Both ETFs employ similar strategies of holding Nasdaq-100 equities and overlaying call options to produce high monthly distributions, resulting in comparable risk profiles tied to equity market volatility and options market conditions.
  • GPIQ benefits from a lower fee structure and longer track record since October 2023, while QQQI emphasizes tax-efficient income through Section 1256 options treatment.
  • In the current environment of elevated interest in income-generating equity strategies, the two funds compete directly as alternatives for investors seeking Nasdaq-100 exposure with enhanced yield.

Introduction

Investors focused on the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index increasingly turn to covered-call ETFs for a combination of equity upside and supplemental income. GPIQ and QQQI represent two prominent options in this category, each pursuing an active strategy that pairs Nasdaq-100 stock holdings with call-option overlays. They compete directly for investors seeking similar exposure and income objectives, differing primarily in cost structure, issuer approach, and minor implementation details rather than fundamental sector allocation.

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) Overview

GPIQ is an actively managed ETF launched in October 2023 by Goldman Sachs that seeks current income while preserving prospects for capital appreciation. The fund invests at least 80 percent of its assets in Nasdaq-100 companies and dynamically sells call options on the index to generate premium income. It holds approximately 106 securities, with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 47 to 48 percent of assets, led by NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation. Sector allocations mirror the Nasdaq-100, with heavy weighting toward technology and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.29 percent. The strategy is non-diversified and uses a proprietary active approach rather than strict index replication.

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Overview

QQQI is an actively managed ETF launched in January 2024 by NEOS Investments that aims to deliver high monthly income in a tax-efficient manner alongside equity appreciation potential. The fund replicates the Nasdaq-100 Index constituents and overlays written call options on the NDX index. It holds approximately 104 securities, with the top 10 holdings representing about 46 percent of assets, concentrated in the same large-cap technology names such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation. Sector exposure aligns closely with the Nasdaq-100. The expense ratio is 0.68 percent. The options strategy incorporates active management decisions on strike selection and coverage levels, with distributions benefiting from Section 1256 contract tax treatment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Nasdaq-100 Index remains dominated by growth-oriented technology and consumer discretionary companies, benefiting from secular trends in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital transformation. Capital flows into income-enhanced equity products have accelerated amid investor demand for yield in a higher-rate environment. Macroeconomic drivers include Federal Reserve policy expectations, corporate earnings cycles from mega-cap technology firms, and ongoing innovation spending. Key risks encompass valuation compression in high-growth sectors, regulatory scrutiny of large technology platforms, and potential volatility from geopolitical or economic shifts that could pressure equity markets and options premiums alike.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Both funds have delivered income distributions well above traditional equity benchmarks during recent market cycles, driven by elevated options premiums amid volatility. GPIQ’s lower expense ratio supports modestly higher net yields over time, while its earlier inception provides a slightly longer performance history. QQQI emphasizes tax-efficient return-of-capital components in distributions. In recent weeks and months, relative positioning has reflected broader Nasdaq-100 movements tied to technology earnings and interest-rate sentiment, with both ETFs exhibiting lower volatility than unhedged Nasdaq-100 exposure due to the call-writing overlay. Differences in performance have stemmed primarily from fee drag and minor variations in options implementation rather than divergent sector bets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including a meaningfully lower expense ratio, comparable diversification, and established active management framework, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of preference to GPIQ for investors prioritizing cost efficiency within the Nasdaq-100 covered-call category. QQQI remains competitive for those valuing its specific tax-treatment characteristics and options execution approach. Selection ultimately depends on individual priorities regarding fees, distribution tax profile, and overall portfolio fit.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GPIQ vs. QQQI commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPIQ is a Hold and QQQI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPIQQQQI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GPIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QQQI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUKX34.020.33
+0.97%
Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF
BETZ18.230.08
+0.43%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ)
CPAI52.600.04
+0.09%
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)
BUFT26.480.01
+0.03%
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF (BUFT)
DCOR84.06-0.23
-0.27%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR)

GPIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPIQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPIQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPIQ
1D Price
Change %
GPIQ100%
+0.53%
LRCX - GPIQ
76%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
KLAC - GPIQ
72%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
AMAT - GPIQ
72%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
ASML - GPIQ
69%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
AMD - GPIQ
69%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More

QQQI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQQI
1D Price
Change %
QQQI100%
-0.50%
LRCX - QQQI
74%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
AMAT - QQQI
70%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
KLAC - QQQI
70%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
ASML - QQQI
68%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
MPWR - QQQI
66%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
More