Advertisement
GRMN vs ST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) vs. Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GRMN holds a dominant market capitalization of nearly $50 billion, significantly larger than ST's approximately $6 billion, reflecting greater scale and stability.
- GRMN has delivered a year-to-date (YTD) return of 28.26%, edging out ST's 25.65%, amid recent market strength.
- GRMN trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 30.17, far more reasonable than ST's elevated 198.52, suggesting better relative valuation.
- Both stocks show positive momentum in recent weeks, with GRMN posting record fiscal 2025 revenue of $7.25 billion, up 15% year-over-year.
- ST has achieved an impressive one-year return of 95.61%, highlighting recovery potential in the sensors sector.
- GRMN's beta of 0.97 indicates lower volatility compared to ST's 1.13, appealing to risk-averse investors.
Introduction
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) represent distinct players in the technology hardware space, with GRMN focused on GPS navigation and wearables, and ST specializing in sensors for industrial and automotive applications. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning, aiding traders seeking relative outperformance and investors evaluating sector exposure in a volatile environment. Both have shown resilience amid broader market rotations toward tech and industrials.
GRMN Overview and Recent Performance
Garmin Ltd. designs, develops, and markets GPS-enabled products across aviation, marine, fitness, and outdoor segments, benefiting from diversified revenue streams. In recent market activity, GRMN shares have climbed toward the upper end of their 52-week range of $178.74 to $273.32, supported by record fiscal 2025 results including $7.25 billion in revenue, a 15% increase. Positive sentiment stems from strong institutional buying, new product launches like aviation wearables, and anticipation for upcoming quarterly earnings, driving gains of over 4% in the recent week and year-to-date returns exceeding 28%. Trading volume and analyst upgrades have bolstered momentum.
ST Overview and Recent Performance
Sensata Technologies Holding plc supplies sensors, controls, and electrical protection solutions primarily for automotive and industrial markets, capitalizing on electrification trends. ST shares have advanced within their 52-week range of $20.57 to $42.37, reflecting a robust one-year return of 95.61% from prior lows. Recent performance includes year-to-date gains of 25.65%, fueled by dividend approvals and sector tailwinds in transportation sensing. Upcoming earnings have drawn analyst attention, with price target raises, though elevated valuations temper some enthusiasm. Market sentiment has shifted positively on industrial recovery signals.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like trend-following, scalping, and sector-specific plays. The featured 25 bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 127%, win rates of 54-88%, profit factors up to 6.94, and profit-to-drawdown ratios often exceeding 5, with trade durations from minutes to weeks on tickers in semiconductors, tech giants, energy, and small caps. These metrics highlight adaptability to current conditions, such as volatility in tech and industrials. Traders can explore and copy these high-conviction signals for potential edge in stock selection.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GRMN and ST diverge in business models: GRMN's consumer-facing GPS and wearables offer recurring fitness sales, while ST targets B2B sensors for autos and industrials, exposed to EV (electric vehicle) and manufacturing cycles. Growth drivers include GRMN's aviation/marine expansion versus ST's electrification demand. Recent momentum favors GRMN's steadier climb, but ST shows higher one-year upside. Risk factors: GRMN faces consumer spending sensitivity; ST, cyclical industrials. GRMN's lower beta signals reduced volatility, with superior market cap and P/E positioning it for defensive plays amid sentiment shifts toward quality tech.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward GRMN over ST, citing superior trend consistency, lower relative valuation, record revenue growth, and upcoming catalysts like earnings. While ST offers momentum from its recovery, GRMN's stability and scale provide higher probability of sustained outperformance in the near term, based on observable technical and fundamental positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRMN is a StrongBuy and ST is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GRMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GRMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GRMN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GRMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
- ST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
GRMN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while ST (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -7.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
GRMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
ST is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+1.43% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| GRMN | ST | GRMN / ST | |
| Capitalization | 46.3B | 6.59B | 702% |
| EBITDA | 2.17B | 538M | 403% |
| Gain YTD | 19.304 | 37.018 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.38 | 156.67 | 17% |
| Revenue | 7.46B | 3.73B | 200% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 635M | - |
| Total Debt | 168M | 2.85B | 6% |
GRMN | ST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GRMN's Valuation (56) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ST (67) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew similarly to ST’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ST (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ST’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's SMR Rating (46) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ST (90) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ST’s over the last 12 months.
GRMN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ST (45) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that GRMN’s stock grew similarly to ST’s over the last 12 months.
ST's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRMN (52) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ST’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRMN’s over the last 12 months.
| GRMN | ST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
GRMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRMN has been loosely correlated with TDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRMN jumps, then TDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRMN | 100% | +1.00% | ||
| TDY - GRMN | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| TRMB - GRMN | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| VNT - GRMN | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| FTV - GRMN | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| ST - GRMN | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||
ST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ST has been loosely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ST jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.