HGBL
Price
$1.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.38M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRX
Price
$62.60
Change
-$1.63 (-2.54%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.5B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGBL vs MRX

HGBL vs MRX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGBL vs. MRX commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGBL is a Hold and MRX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (HGBL: $1.22 vs. MRX: $64.23)
Brand notoriety: HGBL and MRX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGBL: 172% vs. MRX: 247%
Market capitalization -- HGBL: $42.38M vs. MRX: $4.5B
HGBL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $42.38M. MRX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HGBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the long-term than HGBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HGBL and MRX are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.40% price change this week, while MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

HGBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

MRX is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.68% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRX($4.5B) has a higher market cap than HGBL($42.4M). MRX has higher P/E ratio than HGBL: MRX (14.81) vs HGBL (13.67). MRX YTD gains are higher at: 68.641 vs. HGBL (-1.613). MRX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.33B vs. HGBL (5.95M). MRX has more cash in the bank: 6.89B vs. HGBL (11.6M). HGBL has less debt than MRX: HGBL (5.54M) vs MRX (10.4B). MRX has higher revenues than HGBL: MRX (4.1B) vs HGBL (50.2M).
HGBLMRXHGBL / MRX
Capitalization42.4M4.5B1%
EBITDA5.95M1.33B0%
Gain YTD-1.61368.641-2%
P/E Ratio13.6714.8192%
Revenue50.2M4.1B1%
Total Cash11.6M6.89B0%
Total Debt5.54M10.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGBL: Fundamental Ratings
HGBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGBLMRX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MQQQ226.92N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF
BEDZ36.76-0.25
-0.67%
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
DFAE38.84-0.38
-0.97%
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF
PGRO46.44-0.65
-1.37%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
GVIP179.92-4.27
-2.32%
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

HGBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and MRX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and MRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGBL
1D Price
Change %
HGBL100%
N/A
MRX - HGBL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSCI - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
ABTC - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GS - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
MKTX - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRX
1D Price
Change %
MRX100%
N/A
SNEX - MRX
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VIRT - MRX
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
EVR - MRX
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
SF - MRX
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
MC - MRX
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
More