Advertisement
GS vs SF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs Group (GS) vs. Stifel Financial (SF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $275 billion compared to SF's $12 billion, reflecting its global scale.
- GS demonstrates superior profitability with a 29% profit margin and 14.6% ROE (return on equity), outperforming SF's 12% margin and 11.7% ROE.
- Over the past 12 months, GS has delivered stronger returns of +43% versus SF's +9%, highlighting relative momentum.
- Both stocks show similar YTD performance around 6%, but GS exhibits greater upward price momentum in recent weeks.
- SF offers a more regionally focused wealth management model, potentially providing stability amid market volatility.
- Tickeron's AI tools favor GS for its trend consistency and growth catalysts in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines GS and SF, two players in the financial services sector specializing in investment banking and wealth management. Investors and traders analyzing the financial industry may find value in understanding their relative performance, as both benefit from market cycles in M&A (mergers and acquisitions), trading, and advisory services. With broader economic shifts influencing sector sentiment, this analysis highlights key contrasts in scale, profitability, and recent momentum to aid informed decision-making in today's dynamic market environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a leading global investment bank offering services across Global Banking & Markets, Asset & Wealth Management, and Platform Solutions segments. It engages in advisory for M&A, underwriting, lending, trading, and wealth advisory for corporations, institutions, and high-net-worth individuals. In recent weeks, GS shares have advanced from the mid-800s to around $927, supported by strength in its core banking and markets activities amid favorable trading volumes and advisory demand. Sentiment has been bolstered by positive analyst views on its diversified revenue streams and robust balance sheet, with P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio at approximately 17. Market positioning reflects resilience in volatile conditions, driven by global exposure and operational efficiency.
SF Overview and Recent Performance
Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) operates as a diversified financial services firm through Global Wealth Management, Institutional Group, and Other segments, providing brokerage, investment banking, and lending primarily in the U.S., U.K., and Canada. It focuses on private client services, equities, fixed income, M&A advisory, and commercial banking. Recently, SF stock has traded steadily in the mid-70s to low-80s range, reflecting consistent wealth management fee growth and institutional activities. Performance has been influenced by regional market dynamics and steady deposit growth, with a P/E ratio near 15. Investor sentiment remains supported by its niche expertise, though it trails larger peers in scale-driven momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform—specifically, 25 elite bots selected out of 351 total. These bots employ diverse strategies, including swing trading, pattern recognition, and momentum plays across thousands of tickers, with varying timeframes from intraday to long-term holds. Performance metrics often highlight win rates above 60%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and average gains in the 2-5% range per trade, based on backtested and live results. Suitable for current market conditions, they adapt to volatility in sectors like financials. Traders can explore these bots to automate strategies tailored to stocks like GS and SF; visit the page to review detailed stats and copy top performers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS and SF operate in overlapping financial services but differ markedly in scale and focus. GS's global business model drives growth via high-volume trading, international M&A, and asset management (AUM: assets under management), contrasting SF's emphasis on U.S.-centric wealth brokerage and mid-market banking. Recent momentum favors GS with stronger price appreciation, while SF offers relative stability through recurring fees. Risk factors include GS's exposure to market volatility and NII (net interest income) fluctuations versus SF's NCO (net charge-offs) in lending. Sector-wise, both benefit from rising rates, but GS leads in sentiment due to superior ROTCE (return on tangible common equity) and diversification.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward GS over SF, based on consistent upward trends, higher profitability margins, and stronger relative positioning in recent market activity. Factors like superior ROE and growth catalysts in global banking provide a probabilistic edge, though SF remains viable for stability-focused strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and SF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- SF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.74% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| GS | SF | GS / SF | |
| Capitalization | 314B | 11B | 2,855% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.345 | -13.706 | -163% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.21 | 14.38 | 141% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 5.69B | 1,062% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 1.52B | 28,581% |
GS | SF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SF's Valuation (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (84). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (58). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (21). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (57). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (74). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement