Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFPX vs TCBAX
GSFPX vs TCBAX Comparison
Open Charts GSFPX vs TCBAX
GSFPX vs TCBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFPX vs. TCBAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFPX is a StrongBuy and TCBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. TCBAX (131M). GSFPX (0.96) and TCBAX (0.92) have matching dividends . GSFPX was incepted earlier than TCBAX: GSFPX (8 years) vs TCBAX (13 years). TCBAX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). TCBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 121.00 vs. GSFPX (29.00). GSFPX (0) and TCBAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. TCBAX (10.21). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. TCBAX (6.44).
| GSFPX | TCBAX | GSFPX / TCBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.77 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.83 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.201 | 10.662 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 131M | 3,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 10.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.20 | 17.63 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.89 | 6.44 | 542% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement