Ad is loading...
GSFTX vs RMEBX
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSFTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
Price$31.47
Change-$0.78 (-2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.19B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.50
Change-$1.36 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. GSFTX (40.2B). GSFTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GSFTX (1.71) vs RMEBX (1.18). GSFTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSFTX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GSFTX (0.65). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GSFTX (14.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSFTX: RMEBX (250) vs GSFTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.97 vs. GSFTX (2.41). GSFTX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. RMEBX (53.93).
| GSFTX | RMEBX | GSFTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.851 | -1.628 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.2B | 98.3B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.18 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 2.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.75 | 6.69 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | 53.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.44 | 55.39 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...