Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFTX vs RMEBX
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSFTX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income Inst
Price$35.06
Change-$0.17 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.48B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.13B
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GSFTX (43.5B). GSFTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GSFTX (1.65) vs RMEBX (1.11). GSFTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSFTX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GSFTX (0.65). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GSFTX (14.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSFTX: RMEBX (250) vs GSFTX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. GSFTX (7.60). GSFTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.64 vs. RMEBX (54.20).
| GSFTX | RMEBX | GSFTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.543 | 9.366 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 109B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.11 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 11.45 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.63 | 25.15 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.64 | 54.20 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.71 | 77.07 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement