GSL vs NMM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSL is a Sell and NMM is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NMM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GSL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- NMM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GSL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
GSL is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
NMM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.51% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Marine Shipping (-1.01% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| GSL | NMM | GSL / NMM | |
| Capitalization | 714M | 1.56B | 46% |
| EBITDA | 441M | 744M | 59% |
| Gain YTD | 25.420 | 87.163 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.48 | 4.04 | 61% |
| Revenue | 667M | 1.31B | 51% |
| Total Cash | 153M | 24M | 638% |
| Total Debt | 812M | 1.26B | 64% |
GSL | NMM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSL's Valuation (11) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMM (44) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMM’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GSL (20) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to GSL’s over the last 12 months.
GSL's SMR Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NMM (58) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GSL (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to GSL’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSL (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSL’s over the last 12 months.
| GSL | NMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLPNX | 6.45 | 0.09 | +1.42% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Y | |||
| CMVYX | 14.93 | -0.07 | -0.47% |
| Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl 3 | |||
| AFJCX | 18.18 | -0.09 | -0.49% |
| Virtus NFJ International Value C | |||
| MINRX | 34.58 | -0.20 | -0.58% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value R1 | |||
| SPYGX | 18.86 | -0.33 | -1.72% |
| Spyglass Growth Institutional | |||
NMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | 100% | -2.80% | ||
| GSL - NMM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| SBLK - NMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| GOGL - NMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| GNK - NMM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CMRE - NMM | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||