Advertisement
GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 11 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSKH | 68.33 | 1.32 | +1.97% |
| GSK PLC ADRHEDGED GSKH | |||
| TFLR | 51.53 | 0.07 | +0.13% |
| T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF | |||
| EMTL | 43.45 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| State Street® DoubleLine® EM Fxd IncETF | |||
| CEW | 18.96 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strat ETF | |||
| EPI | 45.91 | -0.52 | -1.12% |
| WisdomTree India Earnings ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +2.19% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +3.83% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||