GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Buy and LRCX is a Buy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INQQ | 14.84 | 0.26 | +1.77% |
| INQQ The India Internet ETF | |||
| QQQS | 23.41 | 0.14 | +0.60% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
| LVHI | 32.42 | 0.09 | +0.28% |
| Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| PRFD | 49.78 | 0.08 | +0.15% |
| PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd | |||
| IBMP | 25.16 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 93% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 83% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 83% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | -30.21% | ||
More | ||||