GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFI | 50.78 | 3.63 | +7.70% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momt ETF | |||
| BMAR | 44.54 | 2.98 | +7.17% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar | |||
| NFRA | 56.07 | 2.58 | +4.82% |
| FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF | |||
| KEUA | 19.82 | 0.61 | +3.19% |
| KraneShares European Carb Allw Stgy ETF | |||
| MUI | 12.05 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Municipal Income Fund | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +9.34% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +15.55% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +8.28% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +18.02% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 93% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 93% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 83% Closely correlated | +15.43% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 83% Closely correlated | +24.73% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +12.97% | ||
More | ||||