Ad is loading...
GSLC vs RECS
GSLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GSLC vs RECS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF
Price$117.84
Change-$1.97 (-1.64%)
Volume$231.61K
Net Assets13.32B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change-$0.62 (-1.72%)
Volume$330.07K
Net Assets1.89B
GSLC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLC vs. RECS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSLC has more net assets: 13.3B vs. RECS (1.89B). GSLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: GSLC (2.309) vs RECS (2.137). GSLC was incepted earlier than RECS: GSLC (9 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover GSLC (11.00) vs GSLC (11.00).
| GSLC | RECS | GSLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.309 | 2.137 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 1.89B | 705% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 45.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 0.89 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| KLAC - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| MCHP - GSLC | 69% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||