Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLC vs RECS
GSLC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GSLC vs RECS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF
Price$118.12
Change+$1.14 (+0.97%)
Volume$100
Net Assets13.38B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.61
Change+$0.45 (+1.28%)
Volume$3.25K
Net Assets2.79B
GSLC vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLC vs. RECS commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSLC has more net assets: 13.4B vs. RECS (2.79B). GSLC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: GSLC (1.865) vs RECS (1.560). GSLC was incepted earlier than RECS: GSLC (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). GSLC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover GSLC (17.00) vs GSLC (17.00).
| GSLC | RECS | GSLC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.865 | 1.560 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 2.79B | 480% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.15 | 60% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 49.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 0.69 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSLC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 17 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||