Advertisement
GSUS vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COPP | 23.78 | 0.73 | +3.17% |
| Sprott Copper Miners ETF | |||
| CIBR | 72.58 | 0.99 | +1.38% |
| First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | |||
| BSEP | 47.00 | 0.59 | +1.26% |
| Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| LDRT | 25.28 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| XONE | 49.61 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg One YrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | +1.57% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||