Advertisement
GSUS vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSUS is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSUS | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEIV | 48.50 | 0.56 | +1.17% |
| SEI QiM U.S. Lrg Cap Value Actv ETF | |||
| PBMR | 32.08 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Mar | |||
| MNA | 36.59 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| NYLI Merger Arbitrage ETF | |||
| EDGH | 33.15 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | |||
| LIBD | 270.08 | -2.20 | -0.81% |
| LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | |||
GSUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSUS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSUS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSUS | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| SNPS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| CDNS - GSUS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| LRCX - GSUS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| KLAC - GSUS | 68% Closely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| MSFT - GSUS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -4.56% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 89% Closely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -6.96% | ||
More | ||||