Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$15.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.52M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.95
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GSVCX (426M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMEBX (1.11) vs GSVCX (0.31). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSVCX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. GSVCX (-2.52). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.83 vs. GSVCX (17.40).
| GSVCX | RMEBX | GSVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.885 | 9.788 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.11 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | 9.69 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.05 | 25.45 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.40 | 53.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.02 | 77.07 | -10% |