Advertisement
GT vs LKQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and LKQ is a Buy.
| GT | LKQ | GT / LKQ | |
| Capitalization | 1.6B | 6.12B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 483M | 1.31B | 37% |
| Gain YTD | -36.758 | -19.124 | 192% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.69 | 13.12 | 36% |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 13.7B | 129% |
| Total Cash | 861M | 301M | 286% |
| Total Debt | 8.21B | 5.31B | 155% |
GT | LKQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LKQ's Valuation (3) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (36). This means that LKQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as GT (100). This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's SMR Rating (78) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as GT (98). This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as GT (72). This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (100). This means that LKQ’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.
| GT | LKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LKQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LKQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LKQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -9.33% price change this week, while LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
GT is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
LKQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.36% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPIP | 24.92 | -0.12 | -0.48% |
| State Street® SPDR® Portfolio TIPS ETF | |||
| HSCZ | 42.89 | -0.22 | -0.50% |
| iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF | |||
| IEFA | 98.51 | -0.91 | -0.92% |
| iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | |||
| EPRF | 16.14 | -0.17 | -1.02% |
| Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF | |||
| BITY | 27.42 | -0.42 | -1.52% |
| Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Opt Inc ETF | |||
GT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
LKQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKQ has been loosely correlated with GPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKQ jumps, then GPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LKQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| GPC - LKQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| PHIN - LKQ | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| DORM - LKQ | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| AAP - LKQ | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| GT - LKQ | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
More | ||||