GT
Price
$9.35
Change
+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.9B
15 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$40.06
Change
-$0.75 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.65B
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GT vs MGA

Header iconGT vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts GT vs MGABanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Volume$26.63K
Capitalization3.9B
Magna International
Price$40.06
Change-$0.75 (-1.84%)
Volume$3.79K
Capitalization15.65B
GT vs MGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. MGA commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a StrongBuy and MGA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $9.26 vs. MGA: $40.81)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. MGA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 112% vs. MGA: 94%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. MGA: $15.65B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.82% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than MGA: GT (769.23) vs MGA (12.61). GT YTD gains are higher at: 2.889 vs. MGA (-2.345). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. GT (856M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. GT (902M). MGA has less debt than GT: MGA (7.22B) vs GT (8.65B). MGA has higher revenues than GT: MGA (42.8B) vs GT (20.1B).
GTMGAGT / MGA
Capitalization3.9B15.7B25%
EBITDA856M3.6B24%
Gain YTD2.889-2.345-123%
P/E Ratio769.2312.616,101%
Revenue20.1B42.8B47%
Total Cash902M1.2B75%
Total Debt8.65B7.22B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
GT
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1157
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9273
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5875
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (73) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (92) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as MGA (75) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGA (89) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew significantly faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRD14.420.47
+3.37%
Friedman Industries
EBF21.070.37
+1.79%
Ennis
AGCO103.131.44
+1.42%
AGCO Corp
TNON1.78-0.01
-0.56%
Tenon Medical Inc
XPRO14.55-0.28
-1.89%
Expro Group Holdings NV

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.28%
VC - GT
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
MGA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BWA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
DAN - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.42%
AXL - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+1.14%
LEA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
VC - MGA
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
ADNT - MGA
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
ALV - MGA
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
BWA - MGA
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More