Ad is loading...
GT
Price
$9.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
76 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$44.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GT vs MGA

Header iconGT vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts GT vs MGABanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.99M
CapitalizationN/A
Magna International
Price$44.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.97M
CapitalizationN/A
GT vs MGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. MGA commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and MGA is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (GT: $9.29 vs. MGA: $44.14)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. MGA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 63% vs. MGA: 132%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. MGA: $15.65B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GT and MGA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.67% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than MGA: GT (769.23) vs MGA (12.61). MGA YTD gains are higher at: -22.142 vs. GT (-35.126). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. GT (856M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. GT (902M). MGA has less debt than GT: MGA (7.22B) vs GT (8.65B). MGA has higher revenues than GT: MGA (42.8B) vs GT (20.1B).
GTMGAGT / MGA
Capitalization3.9B15.7B25%
EBITDA856M3.6B24%
Gain YTD-35.126-22.142159%
P/E Ratio769.2312.616,101%
Revenue20.1B42.8B47%
Total Cash902M1.2B75%
Total Debt8.65B7.22B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
GT
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9172
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (10) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (97) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (72) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (91) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGA (85) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew significantly faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAXTX9.170.14
+1.55%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr S2
AADBX16.200.11
+0.68%
American Beacon Balanced R5
IBBFX14.210.05
+0.35%
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus S
CGFAX79.840.07
+0.09%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
BDSIX19.16N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+3.49%
LEA - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
ADNT - MGA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
ALV - MGA
66%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
VC - MGA
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
BWA - MGA
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More