GT
Price
$5.90
Change
-$0.07 (-1.17%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGA
Price
$64.47
Change
-$1.49 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
17.59B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GT vs MGA

GT vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. MGA commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and MGA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (GT: $5.90 vs. MGA: $64.47)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. MGA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 86% vs. MGA: 59%
Market capitalization -- GT: $1.7B vs. MGA: $17.59B
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.7B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $17.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.50% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.37% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($17.6B) has a higher market cap than GT($1.7B). MGA has higher P/E ratio than GT: MGA (27.83) vs GT (4.69). MGA YTD gains are higher at: 22.858 vs. GT (-32.648). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.38B vs. GT (995M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. GT (723M). MGA has less debt than GT: MGA (6.7B) vs GT (8.03B). MGA has higher revenues than GT: MGA (42.3B) vs GT (17.9B).
GTMGAGT / MGA
Capitalization1.7B17.6B10%
EBITDA995M3.38B29%
Gain YTD-32.64822.858-143%
P/E Ratio4.6927.8317%
Revenue17.9B42.3B42%
Total Cash723M1.61B45%
Total Debt8.03B6.7B120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
GT
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (45) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (84) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (99) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (63) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (99) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBUS1.360.06
+4.62%
Cibus
BIAF0.840.03
+4.10%
bioAffinity Technologies Inc
NVRI21.960.36
+1.67%
Enviri Corporation
FOUR38.670.10
+0.26%
Shift4 Payments
SN134.90-3.66
-2.64%
SharkNinja

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.17%
LEA - GT
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
MNRO - GT
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
FOXF - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
MGA - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
GPC - GT
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-2.26%
LEA - MGA
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
VC - MGA
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
CPS - MGA
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
APTV - MGA
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
THRM - MGA
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More