Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTDFX vs RNWHX
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GTDFX vs RNWHX
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
Price$39.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
GTDFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTDFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTDFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GTDFX (1.11B). GTDFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GTDFX (1.25) vs RNWHX (0.90). GTDFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GTDFX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GTDFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GTDFX (20.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTDFX: RNWHX (250) vs GTDFX (1000000). GTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.02 vs. RNWHX (19.11). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.32 vs. GTDFX (0.41).
| GTDFX | RNWHX | GTDFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.441 | 23.941 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.90 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.02 | 19.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.48 | 45.92 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.41 | 20.32 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.52 | 88.47 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement