Advertisement
GTES vs NDSN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. (GTES) vs. Nordson Corporation (NDSN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. (GTES) and Nordson Corporation (NDSN) both operate in the specialty industrial machinery sector, supplying engineered components and fluid handling solutions to industrial end markets.
- Over the past year, NDSN has delivered stronger total returns compared with GTES, while both stocks posted solid year-to-date gains near 29%.
- GTES has a lower market capitalization and share price, offering potentially higher volatility and liquidity characteristics than the larger-capitalization NDSN.
- Recent market activity shows both equities trading within established ranges, with performance influenced by broader industrial demand trends and macroeconomic conditions.
- Sector exposure for both companies centers on manufacturing and processing industries, creating similar sensitivities to capital spending cycles and supply-chain dynamics.
- Market sentiment remains neutral to constructive for the pair, supported by consistent trading volumes and analyst coverage typical of established industrial names.
Introduction
This comparison examines GTES and NDSN to highlight differences in scale, performance trajectory, and positioning within the industrial sector. Institutional and retail investors seeking to evaluate relative value, momentum, and risk characteristics between two specialty machinery providers may find the analysis relevant. The review draws on observable market data and recent trading patterns to present a balanced view of how the two stocks have behaved in the prevailing environment.
GTES Overview and Recent Performance
Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. designs and manufactures engineered power transmission and fluid power solutions used across automotive, industrial, and other applications. The company’s revenue base reflects exposure to cyclical end markets. In recent weeks, GTES shares have traded in a relatively narrow band near $27–$28, following a period of year-to-date appreciation of approximately 29%. Performance has been shaped by steady industrial demand and broader equity-market movements, with trading volumes remaining consistent with historical averages. Investor sentiment appears measured, reflecting the stock’s mid-cap profile and sensitivity to manufacturing activity.
NDSN Overview and Recent Performance
Nordson Corporation engineers and markets dispensing, coating, and fluid-management systems serving packaging, electronics, medical, and industrial customers. With a larger market capitalization, the company maintains a diversified revenue stream. In recent market activity, NDSN has traded around $308–$311, supported by year-to-date gains near 29% and stronger one-year returns relative to the broader market. Price behavior has been influenced by steady order flows and sector rotation within industrials. Sentiment remains constructive, underpinned by the company’s established market position and consistent trading patterns.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that showcases select AI trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of strategies. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, including varying win rates, profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and trade frequencies, as well as different timeframes and ticker universes. Each bot employs distinct algorithmic approaches tailored to specific market regimes. Traders interested in exploring these options can review the full selection and performance statistics directly on the platform.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. operates at a smaller scale than Nordson Corporation, resulting in greater potential price sensitivity to individual contract wins or macroeconomic shifts. NDSN’s broader product portfolio and larger installed base provide more diversified revenue streams and typically lower relative volatility. Both companies share exposure to industrial capital expenditure cycles, yet NDSN’s emphasis on precision dispensing equipment creates additional exposure to electronics and medical manufacturing trends. Recent momentum has favored NDSN on a one-year basis, while GTES has shown comparable year-to-date results with a lower absolute price point. Risk considerations include GTES’s higher beta characteristics versus NDSN’s more defensive profile within the same sector. Market sentiment for both remains tied to manufacturing data releases and interest-rate expectations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning within current market conditions, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to NDSN. The larger company’s stronger one-year performance track record and diversified end-market exposure contribute to this assessment, though outcomes remain contingent on evolving industrial demand and broader equity trends.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTES is a Hold and NDSN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDSN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GTES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDSN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDSN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NDSN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GTES (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -6.70% price change this week, while NDSN (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +7.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTES is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
NDSN is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-3.91% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| GTES | NDSN | GTES / NDSN | |
| Capitalization | 6.56B | 18.5B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 685M | 893M | 77% |
| Gain YTD | 20.633 | 39.003 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.37 | 33.63 | 55% |
| Revenue | 3.51B | 2.9B | 121% |
| Total Cash | 824M | 102M | 808% |
| Total Debt | 2.36B | 1.97B | 120% |
GTES | NDSN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTES's Valuation (49) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NDSN (58). This means that GTES’s stock grew similarly to NDSN’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTES (53). This means that NDSN’s stock grew similarly to GTES’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's SMR Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTES (68). This means that NDSN’s stock grew similarly to GTES’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTES (58). This means that NDSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTES’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTES (90). This means that NDSN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTES’s over the last 12 months.
| GTES | NDSN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
GTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTES has been loosely correlated with NDSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTES jumps, then NDSN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTES | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| NDSN - GTES | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| LECO - GTES | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| NPO - GTES | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ATMU - GTES | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SPXC - GTES | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
NDSN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDSN has been closely correlated with SWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDSN jumps, then SWK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDSN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDSN | 100% | -0.73% | ||
| SWK - NDSN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| IR - NDSN | 69% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| ROP - NDSN | 68% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| HLMN - NDSN | 67% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| GGG - NDSN | 67% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||