GTLS
Price
$203.76
Change
+$0.07 (+0.03%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.16B
100 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBC
Price
$430.51
Change
+$7.12 (+1.68%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.38B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLS vs RBC

Header iconGTLS vs RBC Comparison
Open Charts GTLS vs RBCBanner chart's image
Chart Industries
Price$203.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.03%)
Volume$811
Capitalization9.16B
RBC Bearings
Price$430.51
Change+$7.12 (+1.68%)
Volume$260
Capitalization13.38B
GTLS vs RBC Comparison Chart in %
GTLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLS vs. RBC commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLS is a Hold and RBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLS: $203.69 vs. RBC: $423.39)
Brand notoriety: GTLS and RBC are both not notable
GTLS represents the Industrial Machinery, while RBC is part of the Tools & Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLS: 107% vs. RBC: 97%
Market capitalization -- GTLS: $9.16B vs. RBC: $13.6B
GTLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $9.16B. RBC’s [@Tools & Hardware] market capitalization is $13.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $197.86B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $19.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTLS and RBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLS is a better buy in the short-term than RBC.

Price Growth

GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while RBC (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

RBC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-2.70% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Tools & Hardware (-2.95% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBC($13.4B) has a higher market cap than GTLS($9.16B). GTLS has higher P/E ratio than RBC: GTLS (231.47) vs RBC (51.51). RBC YTD gains are higher at: 41.536 vs. GTLS (6.733). GTLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 688M vs. RBC (509M). GTLS has more cash in the bank: 399M vs. RBC (91.2M). RBC has less debt than GTLS: RBC (1.14B) vs GTLS (3.65B). GTLS has higher revenues than RBC: GTLS (4.29B) vs RBC (1.72B).
GTLSRBCGTLS / RBC
Capitalization9.16B13.4B68%
EBITDA688M509M135%
Gain YTD6.73341.53616%
P/E Ratio231.4751.51449%
Revenue4.29B1.72B249%
Total Cash399M91.2M438%
Total Debt3.65B1.14B321%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTLS vs RBC: Fundamental Ratings
GTLS
RBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
507
SMR RATING
1..100
8773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBC's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GTLS (93) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GTLS (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GTLS (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (30) in the null industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLSRBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFAR23.380.12
+0.52%
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
TEXN26.750.06
+0.23%
iShares Texas Equity ETF
BAMB26.670.03
+0.13%
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF
SYNB31.61N/A
N/A
Putnam BioRevolution ETF
EMF16.76-0.17
-1.00%
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been loosely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
+0.07%
PH - GTLS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
DOV - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
ETN - GTLS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
FLS - GTLS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
RBC - GTLS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More

RBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBC
1D Price
Change %
RBC100%
-1.37%
ITT - RBC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
PH - RBC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
FELE - RBC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
DOV - RBC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
NPO - RBC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More