GTX
Price
$9.39
Change
-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
24 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$94.32
Change
+$0.14 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.26B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GTX vs LEA

Header iconGTX vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs LEABanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$9.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Volume$559.64K
Capitalization2.37B
Lear
Price$94.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.15%)
Volume$649.19K
Capitalization8.26B
GTX vs LEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. LEA commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Hold and LEA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $9.39 vs. LEA: $94.32)
Brand notoriety: GTX and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 61% vs. LEA: 87%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. LEA: $8.26B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than LEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GTX and LEA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.59% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($8.26B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: LEA (14.91) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 4.656 vs. LEA (-0.401). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. GTX (600M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. GTX (259M). GTX has less debt than LEA: GTX (1.69B) vs LEA (2.92B). LEA has higher revenues than GTX: LEA (23.5B) vs GTX (3.89B).
GTXLEAGTX / LEA
Capitalization2.37B8.26B29%
EBITDA600M1.48B40%
Gain YTD4.656-0.401-1,160%
P/E Ratio10.1914.9168%
Revenue3.89B23.5B17%
Total Cash259M1.2B22%
Total Debt1.69B2.92B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5638
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10064
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
989
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (17) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (36) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (62) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LEA (89) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew significantly faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTTX22.720.23
+1.02%
Artisan Focus Fund Investor
OARDX24.930.21
+0.85%
Invesco Rising Dividends A
MYISX22.150.12
+0.54%
Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value Y
VFWAX36.050.17
+0.47%
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Admiral
ICMBX12.820.03
+0.23%
Intrepid Capital Investor

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-0.11%
ALV - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
MGA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
LEA - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LKQ - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BWA - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+0.15%
DAN - LEA
82%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
MGA - LEA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
ADNT - LEA
70%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BWA - LEA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More