GTX
Price
$10.13
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
49 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$41.55
Change
-$1.43 (-3.33%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs PHIN

Header iconGTX vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs PHINBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$10.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization2.37B
PHINIA
Price$41.55
Change-$1.43 (-3.33%)
Volume$577.91K
Capitalization1.78B
GTX vs PHIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. PHIN commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Buy and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $10.13 vs. PHIN: $41.55)
Brand notoriety: GTX and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 90% vs. PHIN: 119%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. PHIN: $1.78B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.20% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.42% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTX($2.37B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($1.78B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than GTX: PHIN (18.24) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 13.547 vs. PHIN (-12.725). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 600M vs. PHIN (433M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. GTX (259M). PHIN has less debt than GTX: PHIN (864M) vs GTX (1.69B). GTX has higher revenues than PHIN: GTX (3.89B) vs PHIN (3.5B).
GTXPHINGTX / PHIN
Capitalization2.37B1.78B133%
EBITDA600M433M139%
Gain YTD13.547-12.725-106%
P/E Ratio10.1918.2456%
Revenue3.89B3.5B111%
Total Cash259M365M71%
Total Debt1.69B864M196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WAESX17.550.16
+0.92%
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Investor
TRBCX191.16N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
SPSDX17.34N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq C
JOHIX25.86N/A
N/A
JOHCM International Select Institutional
DBMZX28.79N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Z

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-3.33%
BWA - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
AXL - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
ALSN - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
ALV - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
LEA - PHIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More