GTX
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.12 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
55 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$58.85
Change
-$0.13 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs PHIN

Header iconGTX vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs PHINBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$13.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.85M
Capitalization2.63B
PHINIA
Price$58.85
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
Volume$334.5K
Capitalization2.29B
GTX vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. PHIN commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Buy and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $13.05 vs. PHIN: $58.85)
Brand notoriety: GTX and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 58% vs. PHIN: 79%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.63B vs. PHIN: $2.29B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.63B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.84% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTX($2.63B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($2.29B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than GTX: PHIN (22.77) vs GTX (9.27). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 46.277 vs. PHIN (24.209). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 574M vs. PHIN (452M). PHIN has less debt than GTX: PHIN (1.04B) vs GTX (1.52B). GTX (3.46B) and PHIN (3.36B) have equivalent revenues.
GTXPHINGTX / PHIN
Capitalization2.63B2.29B115%
EBITDA574M452M127%
Gain YTD46.27724.209191%
P/E Ratio9.2722.7741%
Revenue3.46B3.36B103%
Total Cash232MN/A-
Total Debt1.52B1.04B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIVJX19.760.06
+0.30%
American Funds International Vntg R-5E
DISSX25.01N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Small Cap Stock Index Inv
MOPIX28.31N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class I
BFSIX26.97N/A
N/A
BFS Equity Institutional
MCBVX30.12N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value B

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-0.91%
BWA - GTX
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
ALV - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
APTV - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
PHIN - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-0.22%
BWA - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
VC - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
AXL - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
ALV - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ATMU - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More