Advertisement
ALV vs PHIN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autoliv Inc. (ALV) vs. PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ALV, a leader in passive automotive safety systems, reported strong Q1 2026 results with revenue growth driven by China and India markets, boosting shares over 15% in recent weeks.
- PHIN has shown robust momentum with shares up nearly 18% YTD and 82% over the past year, supported by aftermarket strength and buybacks.
- ALV trades at a lower P/E ratio of 13.1 compared to PHIN's 22.7, suggesting relative value in safety systems amid stable demand.
- Both stocks operate in the automotive components sector but differ in exposure: ALV focuses on safety (airbags, seatbelts), while PHIN emphasizes fuel systems and aftermarket parts.
- Recent market activity highlights PHIN's outperformance in growth metrics, though ALV offers higher profitability margins around 6.5%.
- Investor sentiment remains positive for both amid automotive recovery, with AI tools signaling potential in momentum plays.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ALV and PHIN, two key players in the automotive components sector. Autoliv Inc. specializes in passive safety systems, while PHINIA Inc. focuses on fuel delivery and aftermarket solutions. Traders and investors tracking auto supplier relative performance may find value here, especially amid shifting dynamics like electrification and regional demand recovery. By analyzing recent momentum, financial metrics, and market positioning, this review aids informed decisions on sector exposure without favoring one outright.
ALV Overview and Recent Performance
Autoliv Inc. (ALV) is a global leader in passive safety systems, including airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels, serving major automakers across Americas, Europe, China, and Asia. With a market cap of approximately $9.1 billion and headquarters in Stockholm, the company benefits from steady demand for safety features regardless of vehicle powertrain shifts.
In recent market activity, ALV shares have climbed over 15% in the past month and nearly 44% over the last year, trading near $121 with a 52-week range of $86 to $130. This uptrend follows a Q1 2026 earnings beat, where revenue rose 6.8% year-over-year, fueled by forex gains and robust performance in China and India. Sentiment has improved on expectations for 2026 growth, though shares remain sensitive to global auto production cycles.
PHIN Overview and Recent Performance
PHINIA Inc. (PHIN), spun off from BorgWarner in 2024 and based in Auburn Hills, Michigan, designs fuel injection systems, pumps, electrical components, and aftermarket parts for trucks, passenger vehicles, and industrial uses. Its $2.8 billion market cap reflects a focus on emission-reducing tech and service solutions.
Recent weeks have seen PHIN shares advance around 15% monthly, with YTD gains of 18% and 82% over one year, hovering near $74 in a 52-week span of $38 to $81. Positive drivers include strong aftermarket demand, share buybacks, and diversification beyond traditional fuels. Analyst notes highlight 27% six-month rises tied to cash flow and new wins, though EV transitions pose longer-term risks to core fuel systems.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features 25 top performers curated from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from high win-rate scalpers to long-term trend followers—with standout stats including annualized returns of 15% to 168%, win rates from 55% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Average trade durations range from one day to two months, with sectors like semiconductors, gold miners, finance, and aerospace highlighted. Ideal for current volatility, they offer real-time signals with risk controls. Explore these bots to align with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ALV and PHIN both navigate the cyclical auto sector but diverge in models: ALV’s safety systems enjoy regulatory tailwinds and broad OEM adoption, contrasting PHIN’s fuel-centric exposure vulnerable to electrification, offset by resilient aftermarket growth. Recent momentum favors PHIN with superior YTD and one-year returns, while ALV leads in profitability (6.5% margins vs. 3.7%) and valuation (P/E 13 vs. 23).
Risk profiles show similar betas around 1.3, but ALV’s larger scale provides stability amid China demand, versus PHIN’s buyback support and diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward PHIN for growth potential, though trade-offs include ALV’s steadier catalysts like Q1 beats.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PHIN based on stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and aftermarket catalysts positioning it favorably in recent auto recovery. While ALV offers value and stability, PHIN’s momentum suggests higher near-term probability of relative gains amid positive sector signals.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -5.92% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.
PHIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.13% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ALV | PHIN | ALV / PHIN | |
| Capitalization | 8.86B | 3.01B | 294% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 447M | 331% |
| Gain YTD | 1.232 | 30.783 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.74 | 22.78 | 56% |
| Revenue | 11B | 3.57B | 309% |
| Total Cash | 342M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.25B | 1.04B | 217% |
ALV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ALV | PHIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 60% | 8 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTXL | 297.05 | 7.85 | +2.71% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | |||
| BJAN | 58.79 | -0.07 | -0.12% |
| Innovator US Equity Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| FXA | 69.32 | -0.13 | -0.19% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
| AFGR | 36.20 | -0.37 | -1.01% |
| First Trust Active Factor Lrg Cp Gr ETF | |||
| MSTW | 4.33 | -0.16 | -3.65% |
| Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | |||
ALV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALV | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| THRM - ALV | 67% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| APTV - ALV | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ADNT - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PHIN - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ALSN - ALV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||
PHIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHIN | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| ALV - PHIN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| LEA - PHIN | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| VC - PHIN | 56% Loosely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| THRM - PHIN | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| SMP - PHIN | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||