GUSH
Price
$30.92
Change
+$0.37 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
196.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLPR
Price
$69.64
Change
+$1.41 (+2.07%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
57.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GUSH vs MLPR

GUSH vs MLPR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) vs. ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR)

Key Takeaways

  • GUSH seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, providing leveraged exposure to upstream oil and gas exploration and production companies.
  • MLPR delivers 1.5 times leveraged long exposure to the Alerian MLP Index through an exchange-traded note (ETN) structure focused on midstream energy infrastructure master limited partnerships (MLPs).
  • GUSH maintains an expense ratio of 0.94% and holds approximately 50-60 individual equities in an equal-weighted approach within the energy exploration and production segment.
  • MLPR, structured as an ETN, carries a higher expense ratio near 1.90% and offers exposure to MLP distributions with quarterly coupon payments linked to underlying cash flows.
  • The two ETFs target distinct segments of the energy value chain: GUSH emphasizes upstream volatility while MLPR focuses on midstream stability and income generation.
  • Both products employ leverage, amplifying returns and risks relative to unleveraged benchmarks, with structural differences influencing liquidity, tracking, and counterparty considerations.

Introduction

Investors seeking leveraged exposure to the energy sector often evaluate products that target different points along the value chain. Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) provide distinct strategies within energy. GUSH offers amplified daily results from exploration and production equities, while MLPR delivers leveraged access to midstream MLPs. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as alternative vehicles for investors pursuing sector momentum through different risk and return profiles.

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X Shares (GUSH) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index. The fund employs derivatives to achieve its daily target and resets leverage each trading day. It typically holds 50 to 60 individual equities drawn from the underlying index on an equal-weighted basis. Top holdings generally include companies such as CNX Resources, Expand Energy, and Viper Energy Partners, with the top 10 positions representing roughly 20% of assets. Sector allocation concentrates almost entirely in energy, specifically oil and gas exploration and production. The expense ratio stands at 0.94%. As a daily-reset leveraged product, GUSH exhibits heightened sensitivity to short-term market movements within the upstream energy segment.

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) Overview

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) is an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by UBS that seeks to deliver 1.5 times the compounded quarterly performance of the Alerian MLP Index, less financing costs and fees. Unlike traditional ETFs, MLPR does not hold underlying securities and instead relies on the credit of the issuer for payment obligations. The underlying index tracks master limited partnerships (MLPs) primarily engaged in midstream energy activities such as transportation, storage, and processing. Top constituents typically feature large MLPs including Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. The product features an expense ratio of approximately 1.90% and provides variable quarterly coupons tied to leveraged distributions from index constituents. This structure emphasizes income potential alongside leveraged price exposure to the midstream energy infrastructure sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy sector encompasses upstream exploration and production as well as midstream infrastructure. Macroeconomic factors including global demand trends, supply dynamics, interest rate expectations, and geopolitical developments influence both segments. Upstream activities captured by GUSH tend to exhibit greater sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations, while midstream MLPs tracked by MLPR often demonstrate more stable cash flows supported by fee-based contracts. Regulatory developments around energy infrastructure permitting and environmental standards, along with capital expenditure cycles in oil and gas, shape the broader environment. Investors monitor these factors to assess relative positioning between leveraged upstream and midstream exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, leveraged energy products have displayed amplified responses to sector rotation and commodity trends. GUSH, with its 2X daily reset mechanism and upstream focus, has shown elevated volatility during periods of oil price swings. MLPR, offering 1.5X leverage through an ETN structure tied to midstream MLPs, has generally exhibited somewhat lower volatility due to the more defensive characteristics of infrastructure assets and distribution support. Relative positioning reflects differences in leverage magnitude, index composition, and product structure, with each ETF responding differently to earnings cycles, interest rate shifts, and broader energy market sentiment over multi-week and multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to MLPR. Its lower leverage multiple relative to GUSH, combined with midstream MLP focus and distribution-linked coupons, supports a more balanced risk-adjusted profile within the current thematic backdrop, though both products carry significant leverage-related risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GUSH vs. MLPR commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUSH is a Hold and MLPR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUSH has more net assets: 197M vs. MLPR (57.3M). GUSH has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPR: GUSH (42.027) vs MLPR (26.056). GUSH was incepted earlier than MLPR: GUSH (11 years) vs MLPR (6 years).
GUSHMLPRGUSH / MLPR
Gain YTD42.02726.056161%
Net Assets197M57.3M344%
Total Expense Ratio0.94N/A-
Turnover60.00N/A-
Yield1.569.0017%
Fund Existence11 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GUSHMLPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GUSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSOAX53.040.19
+0.36%
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies A
LSITX75.780.01
+0.01%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth IS
GCSVX9.16-0.04
-0.43%
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Institutional
FMPFX43.10-0.38
-0.87%
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opp R6
CGEZX23.59-0.35
-1.46%
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst

GUSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUSH has been closely correlated with MGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GUSH jumps, then MGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GUSH
1D Price
Change %
GUSH100%
+1.21%
MGY - GUSH
88%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
OVV - GUSH
88%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
DVN - GUSH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
MTDR - GUSH
86%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
EOG - GUSH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
More