HACK
Price
$110.11
Change
+$3.14 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYW
Price
$247.31
Change
+$3.83 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
24.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HACK vs IYW

HACK vs IYW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW)

Key Takeaways

  • HACK targets the cybersecurity sub-sector with a concentrated portfolio of approximately 24 holdings, while IYW provides broad exposure to the U.S. technology sector across roughly 144 holdings.
  • HACK carries a higher expense ratio of 0.60% compared to IYW’s 0.38%, reflecting its specialized thematic focus versus broad market-cap weighting.
  • Top holdings in HACK emphasize pure-play cybersecurity firms such as Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, whereas IYW is dominated by large-cap technology leaders including NVIDIA and Apple.
  • HACK offers thematic exposure to cybersecurity demand drivers, while IYW captures broader technology sector trends including semiconductors, software, and hardware.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and trade on major U.S. exchanges, providing liquid access to technology-related strategies with differing risk concentrations.
  • Structural differences position HACK as a higher-conviction cybersecurity play and IYW as a diversified technology allocation tool.

Introduction

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) represent distinct approaches within the broader technology investment landscape. HACK focuses narrowly on cybersecurity companies, while IYW delivers diversified exposure across the U.S. technology sector. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative tools for investors seeking technology exposure with varying degrees of thematic specialization and diversification.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) Overview

The Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) seeks to track the performance of companies involved in cybersecurity hardware, software, and services. It is a passively managed, thematic exchange-traded fund issued by Amplify Investments. The fund typically holds around 24 securities, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 60% of assets. Prominent positions include Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Cisco Systems, Fortinet, and Broadcom. Allocations concentrate almost entirely in the technology sector, particularly cybersecurity. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%. The ETF employs a rules-based methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with its underlying index of cybersecurity-focused firms. It offers targeted exposure to a high-growth niche within technology.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) tracks a market-capitalization-weighted index of U.S. technology equities. Issued by BlackRock under the iShares brand, it is a passively managed fund providing broad sector exposure. The ETF holds approximately 144 securities. Top holdings feature NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet (Class A and Class C), and other major technology firms, with the top 10 representing roughly 62% of assets. Sector allocations center on information technology, including semiconductors, software, and hardware, with secondary exposure to communication services. The expense ratio is 0.38%. Rebalancing occurs according to the index methodology to reflect changes in market capitalization. This structure delivers diversified access to the overall U.S. technology sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from secular trends in digital transformation, cloud computing, artificial intelligence adoption, and data security needs. Cybersecurity demand remains elevated due to increasing cyber threats and regulatory emphasis on data protection. Broader technology spending is supported by enterprise and consumer shifts toward advanced computing and connectivity. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and capital expenditure cycles influence both sub-sectors. Risks include valuation pressures from elevated multiples, potential regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms, and supply-chain dependencies in semiconductors. Capital flows have favored technology innovation themes in recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected technology sector momentum driven by earnings strength in key holdings and AI-related developments. HACK has shown sensitivity to cybersecurity-specific news and contract wins, contributing to relative volatility tied to niche catalysts. IYW has benefited from broad semiconductor and software leadership, resulting in performance closely aligned with large-cap technology benchmarks. Over recent market cycles, IYW’s broader diversification has provided somewhat lower concentration risk compared to HACK’s focused cybersecurity tilt. Relative positioning favors IYW for investors seeking general technology exposure, while HACK appeals to those targeting cybersecurity resilience amid evolving threat landscapes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor IYW at present. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 144 holdings, and alignment with dominant technology sector momentum provide a more balanced risk-return profile. HACK offers compelling thematic exposure but carries higher costs and greater concentration risk within cybersecurity. Investors prioritizing cost efficiency and sector breadth may find IYW more suitable under current conditions, while those with a specific cybersecurity mandate could prefer HACK. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of structural attributes rather than investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HACK vs. IYW commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 24.5B vs. HACK (2.64B). HACK has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: HACK (33.097) vs IYW (22.016). HACK was incepted earlier than IYW: HACK (12 years) vs IYW (26 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than HACK (0.60). HACK has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
HACKIYWHACK / IYW
Gain YTD33.09722.016150%
Net Assets2.64B24.5B11%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.38158%
Turnover25.007.00357%
Yield0.060.1056%
Fund Existence12 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HACKIYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAK147.253.66
+2.55%
iShares US Insurance ETF
IPAV31.790.18
+0.57%
Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF
TBF24.35N/A
N/A
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
TSPA46.88-0.49
-1.03%
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
WQTM35.56-1.25
-3.40%
WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

HACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACK
1D Price
Change %
HACK100%
-0.12%
RBRK - HACK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
NET - HACK
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
S - HACK
66%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
ATEN - HACK
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.47%
CVLT - HACK
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More