Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) represent distinct approaches within the broader technology investment landscape. HACK focuses narrowly on cybersecurity companies, while IYW delivers diversified exposure across the U.S. technology sector. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative tools for investors seeking technology exposure with varying degrees of thematic specialization and diversification.
The Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) seeks to track the performance of companies involved in cybersecurity hardware, software, and services. It is a passively managed, thematic exchange-traded fund issued by Amplify Investments. The fund typically holds around 24 securities, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 60% of assets. Prominent positions include Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Cisco Systems, Fortinet, and Broadcom. Allocations concentrate almost entirely in the technology sector, particularly cybersecurity. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%. The ETF employs a rules-based methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with its underlying index of cybersecurity-focused firms. It offers targeted exposure to a high-growth niche within technology.
The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) tracks a market-capitalization-weighted index of U.S. technology equities. Issued by BlackRock under the iShares brand, it is a passively managed fund providing broad sector exposure. The ETF holds approximately 144 securities. Top holdings feature NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet (Class A and Class C), and other major technology firms, with the top 10 representing roughly 62% of assets. Sector allocations center on information technology, including semiconductors, software, and hardware, with secondary exposure to communication services. The expense ratio is 0.38%. Rebalancing occurs according to the index methodology to reflect changes in market capitalization. This structure delivers diversified access to the overall U.S. technology sector.
The technology sector continues to benefit from secular trends in digital transformation, cloud computing, artificial intelligence adoption, and data security needs. Cybersecurity demand remains elevated due to increasing cyber threats and regulatory emphasis on data protection. Broader technology spending is supported by enterprise and consumer shifts toward advanced computing and connectivity. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and capital expenditure cycles influence both sub-sectors. Risks include valuation pressures from elevated multiples, potential regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms, and supply-chain dependencies in semiconductors. Capital flows have favored technology innovation themes in recent market cycles.
In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have reflected technology sector momentum driven by earnings strength in key holdings and AI-related developments. HACK has shown sensitivity to cybersecurity-specific news and contract wins, contributing to relative volatility tied to niche catalysts. IYW has benefited from broad semiconductor and software leadership, resulting in performance closely aligned with large-cap technology benchmarks. Over recent market cycles, IYW’s broader diversification has provided somewhat lower concentration risk compared to HACK’s focused cybersecurity tilt. Relative positioning favors IYW for investors seeking general technology exposure, while HACK appeals to those targeting cybersecurity resilience amid evolving threat landscapes.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor IYW at present. Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 144 holdings, and alignment with dominant technology sector momentum provide a more balanced risk-return profile. HACK offers compelling thematic exposure but carries higher costs and greater concentration risk within cybersecurity. Investors prioritizing cost efficiency and sector breadth may find IYW more suitable under current conditions, while those with a specific cybersecurity mandate could prefer HACK. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of structural attributes rather than investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| HACK | IYW | HACK / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | 33.097 | 22.016 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 24.5B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.38 | 158% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 7.00 | 357% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.10 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| HACK | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IAK | 147.25 | 3.66 | +2.55% |
| iShares US Insurance ETF | |||
| IPAV | 31.79 | 0.18 | +0.57% |
| Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF | |||
| TBF | 24.35 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| TSPA | 46.88 | -0.49 | -1.03% |
| T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | |||
| WQTM | 35.56 | -1.25 | -3.40% |
| WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| RBRK - HACK | 69% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| NET - HACK | 68% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| S - HACK | 66% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ATEN - HACK | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| CVLT - HACK | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||