Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HAPS vs SMMD
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs SMMD
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
Price$29.24
Change+$0.16 (+0.55%)
Volume$297
Net Assets132.05M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$69.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
Volume$88.05K
Net Assets1.5B
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. SMMD commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Buy and SMMD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.5B vs. HAPS (132M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: SMMD (3.268) vs HAPS (-0.050). HAPS was incepted earlier than SMMD: HAPS (2 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.60). HAPS has a higher turnover SMMD (8.00) vs SMMD (8.00).
| HAPS | SMMD | HAPS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -0.050 | 3.268 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 132M | 1.5B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 96.00 | 8.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 1.37 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HAPS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| WD - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||