Ad is loading...
HAPS vs SMMD
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs SMMD
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
Price$23.33
Change-$4.01 (-14.67%)
Volume$600
Net Assets106.33M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$57.44
Change-$2.37 (-3.96%)
Volume$5.43K
Net Assets1.12B
HAPS vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.12B vs. HAPS (106M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: SMMD (-11.780) vs HAPS (-20.263). HAPS was incepted earlier than SMMD: HAPS (2 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.60). HAPS has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| HAPS | SMMD | HAPS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -20.263 | -11.780 | 172% |
| Net Assets | 106M | 1.12B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 96.00 | 9.00 | 1,067% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 1.42 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMMD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | +6.58% | ||
| WD - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +6.51% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +14.02% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | +5.07% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +14.48% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +9.12% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.60% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +9.58% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +9.13% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +24.73% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +10.85% | ||
More | ||||