HBAN and USB represent prominent players in the regional banking sector, serving commercial, retail, and wealth management clients primarily in the Midwest and beyond. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing sector rotation amid interest rate dynamics and investors seeking stable dividends with growth potential. Both banks have navigated recent economic pressures like deposit competition and loan demand shifts, offering insights into relative performance, risk profiles, and market positioning in the current environment.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is a diversified regional bank headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, with a footprint across the Midwest and Great Lakes region. It provides consumer and business banking, lending, and investment services. In recent market activity, HBAN shares have hovered around $16.55, within a 52-week range of $14.19 to $19.46, reflecting resilience amid banking sector volatility. The Q1 2026 earnings showcased robust revenue of $2.59 billion, up 34% year-over-year, driven by 33% NII growth and strategic expansions including Cadence Bank and Veritex integrations. Adjusted EPS of $0.37 beat estimates, though net income held flat at $523 million due to acquisition costs. Sentiment has improved with a one-month return of about 9%, bolstered by a stable NIM (net interest margin, the difference between interest income and expense relative to interest-earning assets) and dividend declaration of $0.155 per share. Analyst upgrades, like Piper Sandler's recent move, underscore positive momentum.
U.S. Bancorp (USB), based in Minneapolis, operates one of the largest regional banks in the U.S., with extensive commercial banking, payments processing, and trust services nationwide. Recent trading has seen shares near $56.21, in a 52-week band of $39.28 to $61.19, supported by diversified revenue streams. Q1 2026 results highlighted EPS of $1.18, up 15% year-over-year and topping forecasts, with net revenue at $7.3 billion (up 4.7%) and net income rising 14% to $1.95 billion. NII grew modestly to $4.26 billion amid deposit expansion and controlled expenses, with net charge-offs at a manageable 0.56%. Shares have gained traction in recent weeks, reflecting YTD returns of 6.4% and strong one-year performance, aided by partnerships and consumer deposit growth. Analysts remain bullish, with firms like Oppenheimer raising targets, signaling confidence in its scale and fee income stability.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles—from short-term scalping to long-term trend following. These bots feature impressive stats, such as win rates often exceeding 60%, profit factors above 1.5, and thousands of backtested trades demonstrating average annual returns in the double digits for select performers. The trending section highlights 25 elite bots best suited to current market conditions, enabling users to copy trades automatically for potential outperformance. Explore these bots to align with your risk tolerance and discover strategies tailored to banking stocks like HBAN and USB.
Both HBAN and USB operate in regional banking, emphasizing deposits, loans, and fee-based services, but USB's larger footprint provides broader sector exposure, including payments (a key growth driver), versus HBAN's Midwest focus and recent M&A activity. Recent momentum favors USB with superior YTD and one-year returns, though HBAN edges in revenue growth velocity. Risk profiles are similar, with betas near 1.0 indicating market-aligned volatility; HBAN slightly higher at 0.97 vs. 1.03. Market sentiment tilts positive for both post-earnings, but USB benefits from diversified noninterest income, mitigating NII pressures, while HBAN offers value via lower forward P/E and aggressive expansion trade-offs.
Tickeron's AI models currently favor USB with higher probability for near-term outperformance, owing to its scale advantages, consistent earnings growth, superior historical returns, and resilient positioning amid sector headwinds like rate uncertainty. HBAN remains compelling for growth-oriented traders, but USB's trend stability and catalysts like deposit momentum provide a relative edge in observable data patterns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.38%.
HBAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
USB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| HBAN | USB | HBAN / USB | |
| Capitalization | 34.9B | 90B | 39% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.202 | 9.420 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.24 | 12.12 | 109% |
| Revenue | 8.78B | 28.9B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 79.2B | 30% |
HBAN | USB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBAN's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (37) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.
HBAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.
USB's SMR Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
USB's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (24) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
USB's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
| HBAN | USB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 20 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 53% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBAN has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBAN jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBAN | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| FITB - HBAN | 88% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| PNC - HBAN | 85% Closely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| KEY - HBAN | 85% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| TFC - HBAN | 84% Closely correlated | -6.16% | ||
| MTB - HBAN | 84% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||