Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs PRCFX
HBLFX vs PRCFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs PRCFX
HBLFX vs PRCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PRCFX (410M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than PRCFX: HBLFX (3.49) vs PRCFX (2.65). HBLFX was incepted earlier than PRCFX: HBLFX (9 years) vs PRCFX (3 years). PRCFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. PRCFX (36.30). PRCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: PRCFX (2500) vs HBLFX (1000000). PRCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. HBLFX (6.27).
| HBLFX | PRCFX | HBLFX / PRCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.76 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 2.826 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 410M | 2,707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 2.65 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 9.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.51 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.42 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |