HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PRCFX (415M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than PRCFX: HBLRX (2.76) vs PRCFX (2.42). HBLRX was incepted earlier than PRCFX: HBLRX (16 years) vs PRCFX (3 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PRCFX (0.76). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. PRCFX (36.30). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRCFX: HBLRX (0) vs PRCFX (2500). PRCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. HBLRX (5.06).

	HBLRX	PRCFX	HBLRX / PRCFX
Total Expense Ratio	1.27	0.65	195%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.27	0.76	167%
Fund Existence	16 years	3 years	-
Gain YTD	4.474	3.541	126%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	2500	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	11.1B	415M	2,675%
Annual Yield % from dividends	2.76	2.42	114%
Returns for 1 year	5.06	7.82	65%
Returns for 3 years	18.10	N/A	-
Returns for 5 years	3.73	N/A	-
Returns for 10 years	34.30	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

STOCK / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
DNA	8.94	0.85	+10.51%
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings
APAM	42.11	2.87	+7.31%
Artisan Partners Asset Management
ONCY	0.77	0.02	+2.88%
Oncolytics Biotech
RGLD	202.04	3.69	+1.86%
Royal Gold
DFSC	1.34	-0.05	-3.60%
Defsec Technologies Inc