Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs PRCFX
HBLRX vs PRCFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs PRCFX
HBLRX vs PRCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. PRCFX (414M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than PRCFX: HBLRX (2.79) vs PRCFX (2.65). HBLRX was incepted earlier than PRCFX: HBLRX (16 years) vs PRCFX (3 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PRCFX (0.76). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. PRCFX (36.30). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRCFX: HBLRX (0) vs PRCFX (2500). PRCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. HBLRX (4.57).
| HBLRX | PRCFX | HBLRX / PRCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.65 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.76 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.127 | 4.094 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 414M | 2,681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.65 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 9.03 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.45 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.26 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement