Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs TWSCX
HBLRX vs TWSCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs TWSCX
HBLRX vs TWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. TWSCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and TWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. TWSCX (279M). HBLRX pays higher dividends than TWSCX: HBLRX (2.80) vs TWSCX (1.92). HBLRX was incepted earlier than TWSCX: HBLRX (16 years) vs TWSCX (30 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than TWSCX (1.13). TWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. HBLRX (90.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWSCX: HBLRX (0) vs TWSCX (2500). TWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. HBLRX (5.26). HBLRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.81 vs. TWSCX (2.44).
| HBLRX | TWSCX | HBLRX / TWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.13 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.819 | 3.558 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 279M | 4,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.92 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 6.36 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.97 | 20.44 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.81 | 2.44 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.14 | 25.23 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement