HBNC
Price
$19.75
Change
+$0.17 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINL
Price
$24.79
Change
-$0.10 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBNC vs MBINL

HBNC vs MBINL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBNC vs. MBINL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBNC is a Hold and MBINL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HBNC: $19.75 vs. MBINL: $24.79)
Brand notoriety: HBNC and MBINL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBNC: 48% vs. MBINL: 31%
Market capitalization -- HBNC: $1.01B vs. MBINL: $0
HBNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.01B. MBINL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBNC and MBINL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBINL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBINL is a better buy in the short-term than HBNC.

Price Growth

HBNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while MBINL (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 19.635 vs. MBINL (13.401). HBNC has more cash in the bank: 68.4M vs. MBINL (19.6M). HBNC has less debt than MBINL: HBNC (316M) vs MBINL (4.63B). MBINL has higher revenues than HBNC: MBINL (706M) vs HBNC (-27.12M).
HBNCMBINLHBNC / MBINL
Capitalization1.01BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.63513.401147%
P/E Ratio13.73N/A-
Revenue-27.12M706M-4%
Total Cash68.4M19.6M349%
Total Debt316M4.63B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBNCMBINL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
24%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QXL5.210.12
+2.36%
Quantum X Labs Inc.
JEF52.590.50
+0.96%
Jefferies Financial Group
DIN35.990.28
+0.78%
Dine Brands Global
SOMN50.250.39
+0.78%
Southern Co.
NKTR68.32-2.04
-2.90%
Nektar Therapeutics

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
+0.87%
BY - HBNC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
UVSP - HBNC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
FISI - HBNC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
BUSE - HBNC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
MBWM - HBNC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

MBINL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBINL and MBINN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBINL and MBINN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINL
1D Price
Change %
MBINL100%
-0.40%
MBINN - MBINL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
NPB - MBINL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
BCAL - MBINL
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
HBNC - MBINL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
DB - MBINL
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
More