Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMLX
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMLX
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 588M vs. WCMLX (55.4M). HBSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HBSGX (2.24) vs WCMLX (0.00). HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.91). WCMLX (89.00) and HBSGX (86.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.07 vs. HBSGX (8.99). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.14 vs. HBSGX (-26.28).
| HBSGX | WCMLX | HBSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.183 | 15.625 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 55.4M | 1,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 26.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 32.58 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.28 | 1.14 | -2,297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.78 | N/A | - |