Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMLX
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMLX
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. WCMLX (46.1M). HBSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.91). WCMLX (89.00) and HBSGX (86.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). HBSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. WCMLX (2.69). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.35 vs. HBSGX (-31.18).
| HBSGX | WCMLX | HBSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.856 | 2.834 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 537M | 46.1M | 1,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 2.69 | 392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.11 | 23.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.18 | -9.35 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement