HCMLY
Price
$16.38
Change
-$0.32 (-1.92%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
44.81B
51 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$9.06
Change
-$0.21 (-2.27%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.08B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMLY vs LOMA

Header iconHCMLY vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts HCMLY vs LOMABanner chart's image
HOLCIM
Price$16.38
Change-$0.32 (-1.92%)
Volume$156.36K
Capitalization44.81B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$9.06
Change-$0.21 (-2.27%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.08B
HCMLY vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMLY vs. LOMA commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMLY is a Buy and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMLY: $16.15 vs. LOMA: $9.06)
Brand notoriety: HCMLY and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMLY: 95% vs. LOMA: 147%
Market capitalization -- HCMLY: $44.81B vs. LOMA: $1.08B
HCMLY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $44.81B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

HCMLY (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.02% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($44.8B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.08B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: LOMA (28.12) vs HCMLY (11.37). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 46.131 vs. LOMA (-22.362). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157B vs. HCMLY (6.95B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. HCMLY (4.24B). LOMA has higher revenues than HCMLY: LOMA (667B) vs HCMLY (26.2B).
HCMLYLOMAHCMLY / LOMA
Capitalization44.8B1.08B4,164%
EBITDA6.95B157B4%
Gain YTD46.131-22.362-206%
P/E Ratio11.3728.1240%
Revenue26.2B667B4%
Total Cash4.24B15.9B27%
Total DebtN/A275B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCMLY vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
HCMLY
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
337
SMR RATING
1..100
4468
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
807
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (9) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (37) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (68) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMA (64) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCMLY (80) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLYLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMN46.120.14
+0.30%
Horace Mann Educators Corp
CYCCP5.10N/A
N/A
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
BRAG2.68-0.02
-0.74%
Bragg Gaming Group
GNE15.17-0.13
-0.85%
GENIE ENERGY Ltd
PCOR67.63-1.88
-2.70%
Procore Technologies

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
-1.92%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-0.43%
CX - LOMA
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
KNF - LOMA
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
CRH - LOMA
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
HCMLY - LOMA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
JHX - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
More