Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMNX vs RWICX
HCMNX vs RWICX Comparison
Open Charts HCMNX vs RWICX
HCMNX vs RWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMNX vs. RWICX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMNX is a Hold and RWICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWICX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HCMNX (2.04B). RWICX pays higher dividends than HCMNX: RWICX (1.09) vs HCMNX (0.13). HCMNX was incepted earlier than RWICX: HCMNX (11 years) vs RWICX (24 years). HCMNX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RWICX (1.06). HCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 226.00 vs. RWICX (44.00). RWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMNX: RWICX (250) vs HCMNX (2500). HCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. RWICX (21.43). RWICX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. HCMNX (25.58).
| HCMNX | RWICX | HCMNX / RWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.938 | 15.475 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.09 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 21.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 51.80 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.58 | 33.65 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.64 | 106.63 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement