Ad is loading...
HFCSX vs RRMGX
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs RRMGX
Hennessy Focus Investor
Price$39.37
Change+$0.65 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.57M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$78.50
Change+$1.14 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.38B
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. RRMGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a StrongBuy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.4B vs. HFCSX (447M). HFCSX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCSX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFCSX (28 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). HFCSX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. HFCSX (10.00). HFCSX (2500) and RRMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.68 vs. RRMGX (-15.91). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.06 vs. HFCSX (-35.30).
| HFCSX | RRMGX | HFCSX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.31 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.31 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.350 | -12.011 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 25.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.68 | -15.91 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.82 | -12.70 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.30 | 2.06 | -1,715% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.05 | -0.67 | 6,897% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...