Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMDX vs NAESX
HFMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFMDX vs NAESX
HFMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMDX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. HFMDX (1.25B). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: NAESX (1.10) vs HFMDX (0.01). HFMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFMDX (23 years) vs NAESX (66 years). HFMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMDX: NAESX (0) vs HFMDX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. HFMDX (17.84). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. HFMDX (37.80).
| HFMDX | NAESX | HFMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 18.339 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 1.10 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 24.75 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 58.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.80 | 42.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.16 | 156.41 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement