Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMTX vs TRQZX
HFMTX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HFMTX vs TRQZX
HFMTX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMTX vs. TRQZX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMTX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. HFMTX (3.39B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HFMTX: TRQZX (0.72) vs HFMTX (0.00). HFMTX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HFMTX (17 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). HFMTX (0.86) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). HFMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). HFMTX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. HFMTX (-11.44). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -14.25 vs. HFMTX (-31.33).
| HFMTX | TRQZX | HFMTX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.61 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.119 | 8.544 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 23.2B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | 4.10 | -279% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.31 | 8.25 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.33 | -14.25 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers