Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs SHSAX
HGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. HGHCX (834M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: SHSAX (0.21) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHCX (26 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. HGHCX (40.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHCX (2000). HGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. SHSAX (-0.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. HGHCX (-23.20).
| HGHCX | SHSAX | HGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.09 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.09 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.258 | 7.047 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 6.58B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | -0.09 | -1,112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.93 | 3.89 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.20 | -7.39 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.88 | 27.96 | -89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement