Ad is loading...
HKXCF
Price
$39.28
Change
-$0.89 (-2.22%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
TIGR
Price
$5.68
Change
+$0.17 (+3.09%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
129 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HKXCF vs TIGR

Header iconHKXCF vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$39.28
Change-$0.89 (-2.22%)
Volume$605
CapitalizationN/A
UP Fintech Holding
Price$5.68
Change+$0.17 (+3.09%)
Volume$4.51M
CapitalizationN/A
HKXCF vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. TIGR commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and TIGR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $39.28 vs. TIGR: $5.68)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 29% vs. TIGR: 24%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $52.98B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
HKXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TIGR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TIGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.14% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($53B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: HKXCF (37.88) vs TIGR (15.40). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 28.507 vs. HKXCF (12.671). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. TIGR (69.1M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. TIGR (678M). TIGR has less debt than HKXCF: TIGR (166M) vs HKXCF (1.76B). HKXCF has higher revenues than TIGR: HKXCF (16.4B) vs TIGR (252M).
HKXCFTIGRHKXCF / TIGR
Capitalization53B533M9,944%
EBITDA16.2B69.1M23,444%
Gain YTD12.67128.50744%
P/E Ratio37.8815.40246%
Revenue16.4B252M6,508%
Total Cash265B678M39,086%
Total Debt1.76B166M1,061%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOS5.060.16
+3.27%
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
SATO21.140.48
+2.34%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF
RPHS10.52-0.12
-1.15%
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF
FLRG34.47-0.44
-1.27%
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
IGM98.57-2.49
-2.46%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-2.22%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
+3.09%
FUTU - TIGR
70%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
HKXCY - TIGR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
HKXCF - TIGR
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
HOOD - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
COIN - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.69%
More