HKXCF
Price
$37.00
Change
-$1.06 (-2.79%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
TIGR
Price
$7.07
Change
-$0.67 (-8.66%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
98 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HKXCF vs TIGR

Header iconHKXCF vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$37.00
Change-$1.06 (-2.79%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
UP Fintech Holding
Price$7.07
Change-$0.67 (-8.66%)
Volume$82.8K
CapitalizationN/A
HKXCF vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. TIGR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and TIGR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $37.00 vs. TIGR: $7.74)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 47% vs. TIGR: 59%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $52.98B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
HKXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TIGR is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +16.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.36% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($53B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: HKXCF (37.88) vs TIGR (15.40). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 75.113 vs. HKXCF (6.131). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. TIGR (69.1M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. TIGR (678M). TIGR has less debt than HKXCF: TIGR (166M) vs HKXCF (1.76B). HKXCF has higher revenues than TIGR: HKXCF (16.4B) vs TIGR (252M).
HKXCFTIGRHKXCF / TIGR
Capitalization53B533M9,944%
EBITDA16.2B69.1M23,444%
Gain YTD6.13175.1138%
P/E Ratio37.8815.40246%
Revenue16.4B252M6,508%
Total Cash265B678M39,086%
Total Debt1.76B166M1,061%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDWEX10.80-0.04
-0.37%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R4
STEYX12.98-0.06
-0.46%
AB International Strat Eqs Adv
HDPMX72.26-0.44
-0.61%
Hodges Retail
BUFSX15.47-0.17
-1.09%
Buffalo Small Cap Growth
SNWIX63.72-0.87
-1.35%
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value I

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-2.79%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.59%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.52%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
+5.59%
FUTU - TIGR
72%
Closely correlated
+4.52%
HKXCY - TIGR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
HKXCF - TIGR
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
HOOD - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
COIN - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More